Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30293147›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2018

Use of Physical Activity Monitors in Rheumatic Populations.

Christine A Pellegrini, Sara M Powell, Nicholas Mook, Katherine DeVivo, Linda Ehrlich-Jones

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine A PellegriniDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Discovery 1, 915 Greene Street, Suite 403, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. cpellegrini@sc.edu.
Sara M PowellArnold School of Public Health, Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Nicholas MookArnold School of Public Health, Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Katherine DeVivoArnold School of Public Health, Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Linda Ehrlich-JonesShirley Ryan Ability Laboratory, Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of South Carolina · USShirley Ryan AbilityLab · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review paper is to provide an overview of the recent research using physical activity monitors in rheumatic populations including those with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and fibromyalgia. RECENT

findingsRecent research demonstrates increased use of physical activity monitors in these populations, especially in those with osteoarthritis. Results from cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention studies highlight that physical activity levels are below recommended guidelines, yet evidence suggests benefits such as improving pain, fatigue, function, and overall well-being. While the use of physical activity monitors in rheumatic populations is increasing, more research is needed to better understand physical activity levels in these populations, the effects of activity on relevant clinical outcomes, and how monitors can be used to help more individuals reach physical activity guidelines.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidExerciseFibromyalgiaHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicOsteoarthritisFibromyalgiaOsteoarthritisPhysical activityRheumatoid arthritisSystemic lupus erythematosusTechnology

Identifiers

PMID30293147
OpenAlexW2894826150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.