Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30293124›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2018

Mono-exponential and bi-exponential model-based diffusion-weighted MR imaging and IDEAL-IQ sequence for quantitative evaluation of sacroiliitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Cui Ren, Qiao Zhu, Huishu Yuan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MRI Findings in Axial Psoriatic Spondylarthritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New Perspectives on Diagnosing Psoriatic Arthritis by Imaging Techniques.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cui RenPeking University Third Hospital, Department of Radiology, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Qiao ZhuPeking University Third Hospital, Department of Radiology, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Huishu YuanPeking University Third Hospital, Department of Radiology, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China. huishuy@bjmu.edu.cn.
Peking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81701648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the utility of mono-exponential and bi-exponential model-based diffusion-weighted MR imaging and IDEAL-IQ sequence for differentiating the activity of sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). AS patients were divided into active group (n = 30) and inactive group (n = 28) according to Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) with C-reactive protein (CRP). In addition, 30 healthy volunteers were chosen as healthy group. Subjects were scanned by conventional MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, and IDEAL-IQ sequence. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), and fat fraction (FF) values were measured, and their relative values (rADC, rD, rD*, rf) were calculated by the formula ADC (D,D*,f)

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleObserver VariationProspective StudiesROC CurveSacroiliitisSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexSpondylitis, AnkylosingYoung AdultAnkylosing spondylitisDiffusion-weighted MR imagingIDEAL-IQSacroiliitis

Identifiers

PMID30293124
OpenAlexW2895065669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.