Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30293105›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Chitosan nanoparticles from Artemia salina inhibit progression of hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo.

Mai M Elkeiy, Abeer A Khamis, Mona M El-Gamal, Maha M Abo Gazia, Zeinb A Zalat, Mohammed A El-Magd

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Overexpressing Carotenoid Biosynthetic Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Oriental Hornet (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Advances in nanotechnology, nanopollution, nanotoxicology, and nanomedicine.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mai M ElkeiyBiochemistry Division, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Abeer A KhamisBiochemistry Division, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Mona M El-GamalZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Maha M Abo GaziaDepartment of Histology, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt.
Zeinb A ZalatClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alazhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohammed A El-MagdAnatomy Department, Faculty Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt. mohamed.abouelmagd@vet.kfs.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3314-9202
Tanta University · EGKafrelsheikh University · EGAl-Azhar University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs) isolated from Artemia salina against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) both in vitro (HepG2) and in vivo (diethylnitrosamine-induced HCC in rats) and to investigate the involved underlying mechanisms. Administration of CNPs decreased HCC progression as evidenced by (1) induced HepG2 cell death as detected by MTT assay; (2) induced necrosis as indicated by acridine orange/propidium iodide (AO/PI) red staining, annexin V/7-AAD positive staining (detected by flow cytometry), and upregulated expression of necrosis markers (PARP1 and its downstream target, RIP1 genes), but no effect on apoptosis as revealed by insignificant changes in caspase 3 activity and mRNA levels of Bax and AIF; (3) increased intracellular ROS and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential in HepG2; (4) decreased liver relative weight, serum levels of liver enzymes (ALT, AST, and ALP), total bilirubin, and cancer markers (AFP and GGT), number and area of GST-P positive tumor nodules; and (5) reduced oxidative stress (decrease in MDA levels) and increased activities of SOD, CAT, and GPx enzymes in rat liver. The preventive (pre-treatment) effect of CNPs was better than the therapeutic (post-treatment) effect. Collectively, administration of CNPs inhibited HCC progression in vitro and in vivo, possibly through induction of necrosis, rather than apoptosis, and induction of antioxidant enzyme activities in vivo, but with stimulation of ROS production in vitro. Thus, CNPs could be used as a promise agent for treating HCC after application of further confirmatory clinical trials.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChitosanLiver NeoplasmsNanoparticlesAnimalsApoptosisArtemiaHep G2 CellsRatsChitosanArtemia salinaChitosan nanoparticlesHepatocellular carcinomaNecrosisOxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID30293105
OpenAlexW2895595061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.