Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30293097›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2018

Suicide Risk and the Menstrual Cycle: a Review of Candidate RDoC Mechanisms.

Sarah A Owens, Tory Eisenlohr-Moul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A OwensDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Tory Eisenlohr-MoulDepartment of Psychiatry, Women's Mental Health Research Program, University of Illinois at Chicago, 912 S Wood St., South Tower, Room 335, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. temo@uic.edu.
University of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Ovarian Hormone Withdrawal and Suicide Risk: An Experimental ApproachR00MH109667 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI EISENLOHR-MOUL, TORY ANNE · 2018 to 2020
$747k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH109667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRisk for suicidal behavior may fluctuate across the menstrual cycle. Here, we use the RDoC framework to review potential mechanisms by which the cycle may increase acute suicide risk. RECENT

findingsThe menstrual cycle impacts the majority of RDoC constructs linked to suicide risk, particularly among hormone-sensitive women, such as those with premenstrual dysphoric disorder or premenstrual exacerbation of a psychiatric disorder. Despite this, there are no published studies examining suicidal ideation, planning, or behavior longitudinally across the cycle. More work is needed to understand how hormone sensitivity may relate to both trait and state suicide risk. Intensive multilevel investigations of cyclical hormone effects on suicide risk through specific RDoC mechanisms are suggested. This is a fertile research area and may provide key insights regarding the mechanisms of acute suicide risk.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilitySuicidal IdeationFemaleHumansMenstrual CyclePremenstrual Dysphoric DisorderSelf-Injurious BehaviorEstradiolMenstrual cycleProgesteroneRDoCSuicide

Identifiers

PMID30293097
PMCPMC6844188
OpenAlexW2894806334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.