ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2018
Social media mining for birth defects research: A rule-based, bootstrapping approach to collecting data for rare health-related events on Twitter.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards deep phenotyping pregnancy: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and machine learning methods to improve pregnancy outcomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Pooled it
- Computational Advances in Drug Safety: Systematic and Mapping Review of Knowledge Engineering Based Approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Challenges associated with delayed definitive diagnosis among Japanese patients with specific intractable diseases: A cross-sectional study.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2023Article
- Pregex: Rule-Based Detection and Extraction of Twitter Data in Pregnancy.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Specialty grand challenge editorial innovative approaches for pharmacoepidemiologic research in pregnancy: Shifting the paradigm of Thalidomide's impact on pregnant women.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2023Article
- MonkeyPox2022Tweets: A Large-Scale Twitter Dataset on the 2022 Monkeypox Outbreak, Findings from Analysis of Tweets, and Open Research Questions.Infectious disease reports · 2022Article
- Using Twitter Data for Cohort Studies of Drug Safety in Pregnancy: Proof-of-concept With β-Blockers.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- A comparison of few-shot and traditional named entity recognition models for medical text.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2022Article
- Toward Using Twitter Data to Monitor COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnancy: Proof-of-Concept Study of Cohort Identification.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- The role of machine learning applications in diagnosing and assessing critical and non-critical CHD: a scoping review.Cardiology in the young · 2021Article
- An annotated data set for identifying women reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes on Twitter.Data in brief · 2020Article
- A proof-of-concept study of extracting patient histories for rare/intractable diseases from social media.Genomics & informatics · 2020Article
- Twitter as a sentinel tool to monitor public opinion on vaccination: an opinion mining analysis from September 2016 to August 2017 in Italy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- Pregnancy and health in the age of the Internet: A content analysis of online "birth club" forums.PloS one · 2020Article
- Towards Automatic Bot Detection in Twitter for Health-related Tasks.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020Article
- A natural language processing pipeline to advance the use of Twitter data for digital epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020Article
- Automatically Identifying Comparator Groups on Twitter for Digital Epidemiology of Pregnancy Outcomes.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020Article
- A Year of Papers Using Biomedical Texts: Findings from the Section on Natural Language Processing of the IMIA Yearbook.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2019Article
- Pharmacoepidemiologic Evaluation of Birth Defects from Health-Related Postings in Social Media During Pregnancy.Drug safety · 2019Article
- Towards scaling Twitter for digital epidemiology of birth defects.NPJ digital medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough birth defects are the leading cause of infant mortality in the United States, methods for observing human pregnancies with birth defect outcomes are limited.
objectiveThe primary objectives of this study were (i) to assess whether rare health-related events-in this case, birth defects-are reported on social media, (ii) to design and deploy a natural language processing (NLP) approach for collecting such sparse data from social media, and (iii) to utilize the collected data to discover a cohort of women whose pregnancies with birth defect outcomes could be observed on social media for epidemiological analysis.
methodsTo assess whether birth defects are mentioned on social media, we mined 432 million tweets posted by 112,647 users who were automatically identified via their public announcements of pregnancy on Twitter. To retrieve tweets that mention birth defects, we developed a rule-based, bootstrapping approach, which relies on a lexicon, lexical variants generated from the lexicon entries, regular expressions, post-processing, and manual analysis guided by distributional properties. To identify users whose pregnancies with birth defect outcomes could be observed for epidemiological analysis, inclusion criteria were (i) tweets indicating that the user's child has a birth defect, and (ii) accessibility to the user's tweets during pregnancy. We conducted a semi-automatic evaluation to estimate the recall of the tweet-collection approach, and performed a preliminary assessment of the prevalence of selected birth defects among the pregnancy cohort derived from Twitter.
resultsWe manually annotated 16,822 retrieved tweets, distinguishing tweets indicating that the user's child has a birth defect (true positives) from tweets that merely mention birth defects (false positives). Inter-annotator agreement was substantial: κ = 0.79 (Cohen's kappa). Analyzing the timelines of the 646 users whose tweets were true positives resulted in the discovery of 195 users that met the inclusion criteria. Congenital heart defects are the most common type of birth defect reported on Twitter, consistent with findings in the general population. Based on an evaluation of 4169 tweets retrieved using alternative text mining methods, the recall of the tweet-collection approach was 0.95.
conclusionsOur contributions include (i) evidence that rare health-related events are indeed reported on Twitter, (ii) a generalizable, systematic NLP approach for collecting sparse tweets, (iii) a semi-automatic method to identify undetected tweets (false negatives), and (iv) a collection of publicly available tweets by pregnant users with birth defect outcomes, which could be used for future epidemiological analysis. In future work, the annotated tweets could be used to train machine learning algorithms to automatically identify users reporting birth defect outcomes, enabling the large-scale use of social media mining as a complementary method for such epidemiological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.