Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30292765›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2019

Testing the Central Gain Model: Loudness Growth Correlates with Central Auditory Gain Enhancement in a Rodent Model of Hyperacusis.

Benjamin D Auerbach, Kelly Radziwon, Richard Salvi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Counseling Protocol for a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin D AuerbachCenter for Hearing and Deafness, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Electronic address: bda5@buffalo.edu.
Kelly RadziwonCenter for Hearing and Deafness, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Richard SalviCenter for Hearing and Deafness, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Hyperacusis and Central GainR01DC014693 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SALVI, RICHARD J · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
Neural Basis of HyperacusisR01DC014452 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SALVI, RICHARD J · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Mechanisms of Loudness Intolerance in a Rat Model of Fragile XR21DC017813 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SALVI, RICHARD J · 2020 to 2021
$439k
The Role of Central Gain Control in Hyperacusis of Diverse OriginF32DC015160 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, BENJAMIN D · 2016 to 2018
$183k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC015160NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014452NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014693NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central gain model of hyperacusis proposes that loss of auditory input can result in maladaptive neuronal gain increases in the central auditory system, leading to the over-amplification of sound-evoked activity and excessive loudness perception. Despite the attractiveness of this model, and supporting evidence for it, a critical test of the central gain theory requires that changes in sound-evoked activity be explicitly linked to perceptual alterations of loudness. Here we combined an operant conditioning task that uses a subject's reaction time to auditory stimuli to produce reliable measures of loudness growth with chronic electrophysiological recordings from the auditory cortex and inferior colliculus of awake, behaviorally-phenotyped animals. In this manner, we could directly correlate daily assessments of loudness perception with neurophysiological measures of sound encoding within the same animal. We validated this novel psychophysical-electrophysiological paradigm with a salicylate-induced model of hearing loss and hyperacusis, as high doses of sodium salicylate reliably induce temporary hearing loss, neural hyperactivity, and auditory perceptual disruptions like tinnitus and hyperacusis. Salicylate induced parallel changes to loudness growth and evoked response-intensity functions consistent with temporary hearing loss and hyperacusis. Most importantly, we found that salicylate-mediated changes in loudness growth and sound-evoked activity were correlated within individual animals. These results provide strong support for the central gain model of hyperacusis and demonstrate the utility of using an experimental design that allows for within-subject comparison of behavioral and electrophysiological measures, thereby making inter-subject variability a strength rather than a limitation.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHearingHearing LossHyperacusisInferior ColliculiLoudness PerceptionMaleRats, Sprague-DawleyRodentiaSodium SalicylateSodium Salicylateauditory reaction timecentral gain enhancementhyperacusislocal field potentialssodium salicylate

Identifiers

PMID30292765
PMCPMC8792806
OpenAlexW2895594078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.