Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30292311›Full record

ArticleAnalytica chimica acta2018

Optimization of Folch, Bligh-Dyer, and Matyash sample-to-extraction solvent ratios for human plasma-based lipidomics studies.

Candice Z Ulmer, Christina M Jones, Richard A Yost, Timothy J Garrett, John A Bowden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytica chimica acta, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clinical lipidomics in bacterial sepsis: a systematic review of serum and plasma evaluations.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Candice Z UlmerNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Chemical Sciences Division, Marine Biochemical Sciences Group, Hollings Marine Laboratory, 331 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC, 29412, USA. Electronic address: culmer@cdc.gov.
Christina M JonesNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Chemical Sciences Division, Organic Chemical Measurement Science Group, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Richard A YostUniversity of Florida, Department of Chemistry, 125 Buckman Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA; University of Florida, Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Timothy J GarrettUniversity of Florida, Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
John A BowdenNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Chemical Sciences Division, Marine Biochemical Sciences Group, Hollings Marine Laboratory, 331 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC, 29412, USA; University of Florida, Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology, Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.

Funding

Southeast Resource Center for Integrated Metabolomics (SECIM)U24DK097209 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI EDISON, ARTHUR S, YOST, RICHARD A. · 2013 to 2017
$9.2M
Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NISTNIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to profile the lipidome for untargeted lipidomics applications, analysis by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography - high resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) typically requires the extraction of lipid content from sample matrices using matrix-specific conditions. The Folch, Bligh-Dyer, and Matyash extraction methods, while promising approaches, were originally tailored to specific matrices (brain tissue, fish muscle, and E. coli, respectively). Each of these methods have specific solvent ratios that must be adhered to achieve optimal extraction. Thus, the sample-to-solvent ratios for these methods should be optimized for the sample matrix of interest prior to employment. This study evaluated the appropriate sample-to-extraction solvent ratios for human plasma-based lipidomics studies. An advantage of employing biphasic lipid extractions is the ability to investigate both the aqueous and organic layers for increased analyte coverage in untargeted studies. Therefore, this work also evaluated the multi-omic capability of each lipid extraction method for plasma in an effort to provide a workflow capable of increasing analyte coverage in a single extraction, thus providing a more complete understanding of complex biological systems. In plasma, a decrease in sample-to-solvent ratios from 1:4, 1:10, 1:20, to 1:100 (v/v) resulted in a gradual increase in the peak area of a diverse range of metabolite (aqueous layer) and lipid (organic layer) species for each extraction method up to the 1:20(v/v) sample-to-solvent ratio. The Bligh-Dyer and Folch methods yielded the highest peak areas at every plasma sample-to-solvent ratios for both metabolite and lipid species. Depending on the lipid class of interest, the Folch or Bligh-Dyer method is best suited for analysis of human plasma at a 1:20 (v/v) sample to total solvent ratio.

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansLipidsMass SpectrometrySolventsLipidsSolventsLC-MSLipidomicsLiquid-liquid extractionMetabolomicsMulti-omicsNIST SRM 1950PlasmaSample preparation

Identifiers

PMID30292311
PMCPMC6261534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.