Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30292302›Full record

ArticleAnalytica chimica acta2018

Ratiometric quantitation of thiol metabolites using non-isotopic mass tags.

Xiaofeng Zhao, Dawn S Hui, Richard Lee, James L Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytica chimica acta, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dual Fragmentation Isobaric Tags for Metabolomics.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaofeng ZhaoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Saint Louis University, 3501 Laclede Ave, Saint Louis, MO 63102, United States.
Dawn S HuiDepartment of Surgery, Center for Comprehensive Cardiovascular Care, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Richard LeeDepartment of Surgery, Center for Comprehensive Cardiovascular Care, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO 63110, United States.
James L EdwardsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Saint Louis University, 3501 Laclede Ave, Saint Louis, MO 63102, United States. Electronic address: jim.edwards@slu.edu.

Funding

BIOMIMETIC PLATFORM FOR METABOLOMIC ANALYSISR15GM113153 · NIGMS · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI EDWARDS, JAMES L · 2015 to 2015
$303k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM113153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ratiometric quantitation is used in mass spectrometry to account for variations in ionization efficiencies due to heterogenous sample matrixes. Isotopes are most commonly used to achieve ratiometric quantitation because of their ability to co-elute chromatographically with each other and to have similar ionization efficiencies. In the work presented here, a new non-isotopic quantitative tagging approach is presented which allows chromatographic co-elution and similar ionization efficiencies. Using two variations of maleimide tags, t-butyl and cyclohexyl maleimide, thiols are quantified with a high degree of linearity up to five-fold concentration differences. Because these two tags have similar hydrophobcities, they elute simultaneously which allows them to be used for ratiometric quantitation. Beyond the five-fold linear range, signal compression is observed. This technique was able to quantify thiol changes in both in vitro pharmacological treatments as well as in vivo diabetic tissue.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryAnimalsCattleCells, CulturedChromatography, LiquidHumansMusclesSulfhydryl CompoundsSulfhydryl Compounds

Identifiers

PMID30292302
PMCPMC6176725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.