ArticleStem cell research & therapy2018
Correction to: Treatment of periodontal intrabony defects using autologous periodontal ligament stem cells: a randomized clinical trial.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cell-Based Therapies for Alveolar Bone and Periodontal Regeneration: Concise Review.Stem cells translational medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Application of Biocompatible Scaffolds in Stem-Cell-Based Dental Tissue Engineering.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Review
- MicroRNAStem cells international · 2021Article
- Comparison of Cellular and Differentiation Characteristics of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Human Gingiva and Periodontal Ligament.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The original article [1] contains a major error carried across the captions of Tables 1, 2, and 3. In each table caption, the data were expressed as "mean ± standard deviation (SD)"; unfortunately, the authors had mistakenly expressed the data as "mean ± standard error (SE)" instead. As such, all mentions of "mean ± standard error" in those table captions should of course state "mean ± standard deviation". The authors are deeply sorry for these errors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.