Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291763›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2019

Electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use in relation to mental health conditions, past-month serious psychological distress and cigarette smoking status, 2017.

Claire Adams Spears, Dina M Jones, Scott R Weaver, Bo Yang, Terry F Pechacek, Michael P Eriksen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cigarette Use, E-Cigarette Use, and Dual Product Use Are Higher Among Adults With Serious Psychological Distress in the United States: 2014-2017.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire Adams SpearsTobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7869-5661
Dina M JonesTobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Scott R WeaverTobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bo YangTobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Terry F PechacekTobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Michael P EriksenTobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

The Science of Decision Making: Connecting People and PolicyP50DA036128 · NIDA · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ERIKSEN, MICHAEL PAUL · 2013 to 2018
$19.4M
Using Mobile Technology to Understand and Encourage Mindfulness for Smoking CessaK23AT008442 · NCCIH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPEARS, CLAIRE ADAMS · 2014 to 2018
$623k
NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT008442NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAdults with mental health conditions (MHC) exhibit disproportionately high smoking prevalence and experience profound tobacco-related disparities. US nationally representative surveys from 2012 to 2015 found relatively high usage of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS; e.g. e-cigarettes) among adults with MHC. However, research has not examined these associations specifically among never smokers. Aims were to examine associations among MHC diagnosis, serious psychological distress (SPD) and ENDS use and to test whether associations varied by cigarette smoking status.

designCross-sectional US nationally representative survey.

settingUnited States, 2017.

participantsA total of 5762 adults (52.0% female; 64.8% non-Hispanic white, 11.4% non-Hispanic black, 15.9% Hispanic, 7.9% non-Hispanic other). MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were lifetime, current and current daily ENDS use. Predictors were lifetime MHC, past-month SPD and cigarette smoking status, and covariates were gender, age, race/ethnicity, education and annual household income.

findingslifetime MHC and past-month SPD were each associated with higher likelihood of having ever used ENDS (P ≤ 0.001), currently using ENDS (P ≤ 0.001) and currently using ENDS daily (P < 0.05). There were interactions between MHC and smoking status in predicting ENDS use, such that MHC status predicted higher lifetime and current ENDS use specifically among never and current smokers. Never smokers with MHC had 2.62 higher odds [95% confidence interval, (CI) = 1.54, 4.45] of current ENDS use than those without MHC. Among never smokers, those with MHC indicated higher expectations that ENDS would improve relaxation and concentration (P < 0.05).

conclusionsIn 2017, US adults with versus without mental health conditions (MHC) were more likely to use electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). In particular, both never and current smokers with MHC reported disproportionately high rates of current ENDS use.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsPsychological DistressAdolescentAdultCigarette SmokingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceUnited StatesVapingYoung AdultCigarettese-cigarette outcome expectationse-cigaretteselectronic nicotine delivery systemsmental health conditionspsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID30291763
PMCPMC6314897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.