Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291759›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2019

Whole genome sequencing reveals rare off-target mutations and considerable inherent genetic or/and somaclonal variations in CRISPR/Cas9-edited cotton plants.

Jianying Li, Hakim Manghwar, Lin Sun, Pengcheng Wang, Guanying Wang, Hanyan Sheng, Jie Zhang, Hao Liu, Lei Qin, Hangping Rui and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing Technology in Potato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CRISPR/Cas9 revolutionizesHorticulture research · 2024
    Article
  16. CRISPR/Cas9 as a Mutagenic Factor.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jianying LiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9825-672X
Hakim ManghwarNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lin SunNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Pengcheng WangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Guanying WangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hanyan ShengNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jie ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hao LiuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lei QinNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hangping RuiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Bo LiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Keith LindseyDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Henry DaniellDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4485-1176
Shuangxia JinNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1495-9154
Xianlong ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-524X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been extensively applied for crop improvement. However, our understanding of Cas9 specificity is very limited in Cas9-edited plants. To identify on- and off-target mutation in an edited crop, we described whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 14 Cas9-edited cotton plants targeted to three genes, and three negative (Ne) control and three wild-type (WT) plants. In total, 4188-6404 unique single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 312-745 insertions/deletions (indels) were detected in 14 Cas9-edited plants compared to WT, negative and cotton reference genome sequences. Since the majority of these variations lack a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM), we demonstrated that the most variations following Cas9-edited are due either to somaclonal variation or/and pre-existing/inherent variation from maternal plants, but not off-target effects. Of a total of 4413 potential off-target sites (allowing ≤5 mismatches within the 20-bp sgRNA and 3-bp PAM sequences), the WGS data revealed that only four are bona fide off-target indel mutations, validated by Sanger sequencing. Moreover, inherent genetic variation of WT can generate novel off-target sites and destroy PAMs, which suggested great care should be taken to design sgRNA for the minimizing of off-target effect. These findings suggested that CRISPR/Cas9 system is highly specific for cotton plants.

Indexed as

Whole Genome SequencingCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGossypiumMutationPlants, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Associated Protein 9cottonCRISPR/Cas9off-targetpre-existing/inherent variationsomaclonal variationwhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30291759
PMCPMC6587709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.