Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291698›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2018

Perspective review of what is needed for molecular-specific fluorescence-guided surgery.

Brian W Pogue, Eben L Rosenthal, Samuel Achilefu, Gooitzen M van Dam

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Real-Time SLAM-Based Correction and 3D Visualization for Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian W PogueDartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering and Department of Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine, United States.
Eben L RosenthalStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Stan, United States.
Samuel AchilefuWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Gooitzen M van DamUniversity Medical Center Groningen, Department of Surgery, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging,, The Netherlands.
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

Molecular Fluorescence-Guided Surgery PlatformR01CA167413 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI PAULSEN, KEITH D., SAMKOE, KIMBERLEY · 2013 to 2025
$5.7M
Prototype optical device for image guided surgery with panitumumab-IRDye800R01CA190306 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ROSENTHAL, EBEN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167413NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular image-guided surgery has the potential for translating the tools of molecular pathology to real-time guidance in surgery. As a whole, there are incredibly positive indicators of growth, including the first United States Food and Drug Administration clearance of an enzyme-biosynthetic-activated probe for surgery guidance, and a growing number of companies producing agents and imaging systems. The strengths and opportunities must be continued but are hampered by important weaknesses and threats within the field. A key issue to solve is the inability of macroscopic imaging tools to resolve microscopic biological disease heterogeneity and the limitations in microscopic systems matching surgery workflow. A related issue is that parsing out true molecular-specific uptake from simple-enhanced permeability and retention is hard and requires extensive pathologic analysis or multiple in vivo tests, comparing fluorescence accumulation with standard histopathology and immunohistochemistry. A related concern in the field is the over-reliance on a finite number of chosen preclinical models, leading to early clinical translation when the probe might not be optimized for high intertumor variation or intratumor heterogeneity. The ultimate potential may require multiple probes, as are used in molecular pathology, and a combination with ultrahigh-resolution imaging and image recognition systems, which capture the data at a finer granularity than is possible by the surgeon. Alternatively, one might choose a more generalized approach by developing the tracer based on generic hallmarks of cancer to create a more "one-size-fits-all" concept, similar to metabolic aberrations as exploited in fluorodeoxyglucose - positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) (i.e., Warburg effect) or tumor acidity. Finally, methods to approach the problem of production cost minimization and regulatory approvals in a manner consistent with the potential revenue of the field will be important. In this area, some solid steps have been demonstrated in the use of fluorescent labeling commercial antibodies and separately in microdosing studies with small molecules.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingOptical ImagingSurgery, Computer-AssistedAnimalsHumansMiceNeoplasmscancerfluorescentresectionsurgicaltherapy

Identifiers

PMID30291698
PMCPMC6210787
OpenAlexW2894923350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.