Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291602›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2019

Screening for Adverse Drug Events: a Randomized Trial of Automated Calls Coupled with Phone-Based Pharmacist Counseling.

Gordon D Schiff, Elissa Klinger, Alejandra Salazar, Jeffrey Medoff, Mary G Amato, E John Orav, Shimon Shaykevich, Enrique V Seoane, Lake Walsh, Theresa E Fuller and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02087293 (e-Pharmacovigilance II - Surveillance for Safety and Effectiveness - Calling for Earlier Detection of Adverse Reactions), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02087293 naunknown statusnot on this map

e-Pharmacovigilance II - Surveillance for Safety and Effectiveness - Calling for Earlier Detection of Adverse Reactions

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2013 to 2016Enrolled38,400ConditionsDiabetes, Depression, Insomnia, HypertensionArmsIntervention arm - automated call and phone-based pharmacist counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial intelligence in the field of pharmacy practice: A literature review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gordon D SchiffDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. gschiff@partners.org.
Elissa KlingerDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Alejandra SalazarDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey MedoffDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Mary G AmatoMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences University, Boston, MA, USA.
E John OravDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Shimon ShaykevichDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Enrique V SeoaneSchool of Pharmacy, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA.
Lake WalshDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Theresa E FullerDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Patricia C DykesDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
David W BatesDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer S HaasDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USChapman University · USMCPHS University · US

Funding

Health Information Technology Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics *U19HS021094 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BATES, DAVID W., MD,MSC · 2011 to 2015
$4.1M
AHRQ HHS U19 HS021094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication adverse events are important and common yet are often not identified by clinicians. We evaluated an automated telephone surveillance system coupled with transfer to a live pharmacist to screen potentially drug-related symptoms after newly starting medications for four common primary care conditions: hypertension, diabetes, depression, and insomnia.

methodsCluster randomized trial with automated calls to eligible patients at 1 and 4 months after starting target drugs from intervention primary care clinics compared to propensity-matched patients from control clinics. Primary and secondary outcomes were physician documentation of any adverse effects associated with newly prescribed target medication, and whether the medication was discontinued and, if yes, whether the reason for stopping was an adverse effect.

resultsOf 4876 eligible intervention clinic patients who were contacted using automated calls, 776 (15.1%) responded and participated in the automated call. Based on positive symptom responses or request to speak to a pharmacist, 320 patients were transferred to the pharmacist and discussed 1021 potentially drug-related symptoms. Of these, 188 (18.5%) were assessed as probably and 479 (47.1%) as possibly related to the medication. Compared to a propensity-matched cohort of control clinic patients, intervention patients were significantly more likely to have adverse effects documented in the medical record by a physician (277 vs. 164 adverse effects, p < 0.0001, and 177 vs. 122 patients discontinued with documented adverse effects, p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Systematic automated telephone outreach monitoring coupled with real-time phone referral to a pharmacist identified a substantial number of previously unidentified potentially drug-related symptoms, many of which were validated as probably or possibly related to the drug by the pharmacist or their physicians. Multiple challenges were encountered using the interactive voice response (IVR) automated calling system, suggesting that other approaches may need to be considered and evaluated.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02087293.

Indexed as

Cell PhonePharmacistsProfessional RoleAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCounselingDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30291602
PMCPMC6374268
OpenAlexW2894764274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.