ArticleObesity surgery2019
A Stepwise Approach in Learning Surgical Residents a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Training in endocrine surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study describes a stepwise training program to teach a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Results of a resident are compared to experienced bariatric surgeons (EBS).
methodsThe resident performed a varying amount of surgical steps and the duration of every step was measured using video analysis. In order to compare the resident's results to EBS, the average time per step was calculated for 30 procedures.
resultsThe total procedure time of LRYGB was 61.15 (± 8.74) min for a novice resident. In comparison, the average of three EBS was 36.22 (± 9.06) min. Creation of the gastric pouch had an average of 12.82 (± 4.08) versus 6.93 (± 2.58) min. Duration of creating the stapled gastrojejunostomy was 7.43 (± 2.11) versus 4.48 (± 2.02) min. Suturing of the gastrojejunostomy was 12.60 (± 3.31) compared to 6.31 (± 2.53) min. Creating the jejunojejunal anastomosis had a duration of 7.12 ( ±2.31) versus 4.22 (± 1.60) min and suturing this anastomosis was 13.93 (± 3.81) compared to 8.51 (± 3.37) min. At the end of the traineeship, the observed progression approximated the skills level of the EBS.
conclusionThe stepwise LRYGB-training program, analysed in this study, can result in an efficient and safe way to approach the learning curve to the level of the EBS. Within this training program, the total time of the operation is kept low in order to prevent adverse events for the patient and loss of efficiency in the bariatric program. The results of this study could act as a guideline for the development of such training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30291579What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.