Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291571›Full record

SynthesisCurrent pain and headache reports2018

Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain: a Systemic Review.

Michael A Fishman, Phillip S Kim

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current pain and headache reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. 16. Pain in chronic pancreatitis.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
  4. Serotonin therapies for opioid-induced disordered swallow and respiratory depression.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A physician-pharmacist collaborative care model to prevent opioid misuse.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael A FishmanCenter for Interventional Pain and Spine, Wilmington, DE, USA. MFishman@centerisp.com.
Phillip S KimCenter for Interventional Pain and Spine, Wilmington, DE, USA.
International Spine, Pain & Performance · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to evaluate and explain our current understanding of the clinical use of buprenorphine in the treatment of chronic pain. RECENT

findingsThere has been few high-quality, unbiased studies performed on the use of buprenorphine in the treatment of chronic pain. Buprenorphine is an effective and safe analgesic that is tolerated at least as well, if not better, than other opioids. Given its safety and mechanistic advantages, the authors believe there is an important role for buprenorphine in the treatment of chronic pain severe enough to warrant the use of an opioid analgesic. Though data is lacking for superiority in chronic pain states, the other advantages of the molecule make it the preferential first-line opioid for around-the-clock pain in our practice.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineChronic PainHumansAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphineChronic pain

Identifiers

PMID30291571
OpenAlexW2895399429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.