Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291551›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2019

Sustained conscious access to incidental memories in RSVP.

Julian Matthews, Jamin Wu, Vanessa Corneille, Jakob Hohwy, Jeroen van Boxtel, Naotsugu Tsuchiya

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dimensions of corvid consciousness.Animal cognition · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Is episodic-like memoryPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Conscious access in the near absence of attention: critical extensions on the dual-task paradigm.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian MatthewsSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia. julian.r.matthews@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-3403
Jamin WuSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Vanessa CorneilleSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Jakob HohwyCognition and Philosophy Lab, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Jeroen van BoxtelSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Naotsugu TsuchiyaSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DP160102770Australian Research Council Future Fellowship FT120100619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In visual search of natural scenes, differentiation of briefly fixated but task-irrelevant distractor items from incidental memory is often comparable to explicit memorization. However, many characteristics of incidental memory remain unclear, including the capacity for its conscious retrieval. Here, we examined incidental memory for faces in either upright or inverted orientation using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP). Subjects were instructed to detect a target face in a sequence of 8-15 faces cropped from natural scene photographs (Experiment 1). If the target face was identified within a brief time window, the subject proceeded to an incidental memory task. Here, subjects used incidental memory to discriminate between a probe face (a distractor in the RSVP stream) and a novel, foil face. In Experiment 2 we reduced scene-related semantic coherency by intermixing faces from multiple scenes and contrasted incidental memory with explicit memory, a condition where subjects actively memorized each face from the sequence without searching for a target. In both experiments, we measured objective performance (Type 1 AUC) and metacognitive accuracy (Type 2 AUC), revealing sustained and consciously accessible incidental memory for upright and inverted faces. In novel analyses of face categories, we examined whether accuracy or metacognitive judgments are affected by shared semantic features (i.e., similarity in gender, race, age). Similarity enhanced the accuracy of incidental memory discriminations but did not influence metacognition. We conclude that incidental memory is sustained and consciously accessible, is not reliant on scene contexts, and is not enhanced by explicit memorization.

Indexed as

AdultConsciousnessFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMaleMemoryOrientation, SpatialPhotic StimulationSemanticsConsciousnessFace perceptionGenderMetacognitionShort-term memorySignal detection theory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.