Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291538›Full record

Trial reportJournal of behavioral medicine2018

Evaluation of expressive writing for postpartum health: a randomised controlled trial.

Susan Ayers, Rosalind Crawley, Susan Button, Alexandra Thornton, Andy P Field, Chris Flood, Suzanne Lee, Andrew Eagle, Robert Bradley, Donna Moore and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Susan AyersCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK. susan.ayers@city.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6153-2460
Rosalind CrawleySchool of Psychology, University of Sunderland, Chester Road, Sunderland, SR2 7PT, UK.
Susan ButtonCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Alexandra ThorntonCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Andy P FieldSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, UK.
Chris FloodCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Suzanne LeeCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Andrew EagleCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, W10 6DZ, UK.
Robert BradleyBrighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust, Eastern Road, Brighton, BN2 5BE, UK.
Donna MooreCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Gill GyteNational Childbirth Trust, 30 Euston Square, London, NW1 2FB, UK.
Helen SmithDivision of Public Health and Primary Care, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, BN1 9PH, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0211-24096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy, birth and adjusting to a new baby is a potentially stressful time that can negatively affect the health of women. There is some evidence that expressive writing can have positive effects on psychological and physical health, particularly during stressful periods. The current study aimed to evaluate whether expressive writing would improve women's postpartum health. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with three conditions: expressive writing (n = 188), a control writing task (n = 213), or normal care (n = 163). Measures of psychological health, physical health and quality of life were measured at baseline (6-12 weeks postpartum), 1 and 6 months later. Ratings of stress were taken before and after the expressive writing task. Intent-to-treat analyses showed no significant differences between women in the expressive writing, control writing and normal care groups on measures of physical health, anxiety, depression, mood or quality of life at 1 and 6 months. Uptake and adherence to the writing tasks was low. However, women in the expressive writing group rated their stress as significantly reduced after completing the task. Cost analysis suggest women who did expressive writing had the lowest costs in terms of healthcare service use and lowest cost per unit of improvement in quality of life. Results suggest expressive writing is not effective as a universal intervention for all women 6-12 weeks postpartum. Future research should examine expressive writing as a targeted intervention for women in high-risk groups, such as those with mild or moderate depression, and further examine cost-effectiveness.Clinical trial registration number ISRCTN58399513 www.isrctn.com.

Indexed as

WritingAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultBayes TheoremDepressionFemaleHumansMental HealthNarrative TherapyPostpartum PeriodPregnancyQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesExpressive writingMental healthPhysical healthPostpartumQuality of lifeSelf-help

Identifiers

PMID30291538
PMCPMC6209049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.