Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291482›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2018

Effect of intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before fresh embryo transfer on IVF and ICSI outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Wenhui Hou, Gaohui Shi, Bing Cai, Chenhui Ding, Junli Song, Xiubing Zhang, Yanwen Xu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenhui HouReproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Gaohui ShiReproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Bing CaiReproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Chenhui DingReproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Junli SongReproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiubing ZhangReproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yanwen XuReproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. xuyanwen663000@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8308-9383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) before fresh embryo transfer (ET) on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching electronic databases. The outcomes of live birth, clinical pregnancy, implantation, biochemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage between groups with and without hCG injections were analyzed. Summary measures were reported as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals.

resultsSix RCTs on fresh embryo transfer (ET) were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 2759 women undergoing fresh ET were enrolled (hCG group n = 1429; control group n = 1330). Intrauterine injection of hCG significantly increased rates of biochemical pregnancy (RR 1.61) and ongoing pregnancy (RR 1.58) compared to controls. However, there were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy (RR 1.11), implantation (RR 1.17), miscarriage (RR 0.91), ectopic (RR 1.65) or live birth rates (RR 1.13) between the hCG group and control group.

conclusionThe current evidence for intrauterine injection of hCG before fresh ET does not support its use in an assisted reproduction cycle.

Indexed as

AdultBlood Transfusion, IntrauterineChorionic GonadotropinEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicChorionic GonadotropinFresh embryo transferhCGICSIIntrauterine injectionIVFMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID30291482
PMCPMC6244658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.