Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291477›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2019

Towards Accurate Segmentation of Retinal Vessels and the Optic Disc in Fundoscopic Images with Generative Adversarial Networks.

Jaemin Son, Sang Jun Park, Kyu-Hwan Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. (DA-U)BMC ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaemin SonVUNO Inc., 6F, 507, Gangnam-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Jun ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Kyu-Hwan JungVUNO Inc., 6F, 507, Gangnam-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. khwan.jung@vuno.co.ORCID 0000-0002-6626-6800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic segmentation of the retinal vasculature and the optic disc is a crucial task for accurate geometric analysis and reliable automated diagnosis. In recent years, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have shown outstanding performance compared to the conventional approaches in the segmentation tasks. In this paper, we experimentally measure the performance gain for Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) framework when applied to the segmentation tasks. We show that GAN achieves statistically significant improvement in area under the receiver operating characteristic (AU-ROC) and area under the precision and recall curve (AU-PR) on two public datasets (DRIVE, STARE) by segmenting fine vessels. Also, we found a model that surpassed the current state-of-the-art method by 0.2 - 1.0% in AU-ROC and 0.8 - 1.2% in AU-PR and 0.5 - 0.7% in dice coefficient. In contrast, significant improvements were not observed in the optic disc segmentation task on DRIONS-DB, RIM-ONE (r3) and Drishti-GS datasets in AU-ROC and AU-PR.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerOphthalmoscopyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOptic DiskPattern Recognition, AutomatedRetinal VesselsConvolutional neural networkGenerative adversarial networksOptic disc segmentationRetinal vessel segmentation

Identifiers

PMID30291477
PMCPMC6499859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.