Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291464›Full record

SynthesisLasers in medical science2018

Photobiomodulation on critical bone defects of rat calvaria: a systematic review.

Patricia Brassolatti, Ana Laura Martins de Andrade, Paulo Sérgio Bossini, Daiana Laurenci Orth, Fernanda Oliveira Duarte, Ana Beatriz Dos Anjos Souza, Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto, Fernanda de Freitas Anibal

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Surgical induction model of femoral defect in Wistar rats for bone repair histology.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patricia BrassolattiDepartment of Morphology and Pathology, Post-Graduate Program in Evolutionary Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luis, Km 235., Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo, 13565-905, Brazil. patty.brassolatti@gmail.com.
Ana Laura Martins de AndradeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Post-Graduate Program of Physiotherapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Paulo Sérgio BossiniResearch and Education Center for Phototherapy in Health Sciences (NUPEN), Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Daiana Laurenci OrthPost-Graduate Program of Biotechnology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Fernanda Oliveira DuarteDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ophthalmic Instrumentation Laboratory, Engineering School of São Carlos (USP), Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Ana Beatriz Dos Anjos SouzaDepartment of Morphology and Pathology, Post-Graduate Program in Evolutionary Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luis, Km 235., Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo, 13565-905, Brazil.
Nivaldo Antonio ParizottoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Post-Graduate Program of Physiotherapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Fernanda de Freitas AnibalDepartment of Morphology and Pathology, Post-Graduate Program in Evolutionary Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luis, Km 235., Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo, 13565-905, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects following trauma represent a high impact on the quality of life of millions of people around the world. The aim of this study was to review photobiomodulation (PBM) action in the treatment of bone critical defects in rat calvaria, related to evaluation of the current protocols applied. One hundred and forty-seven articles related to the subject were found by searching the main databases (Pubmed, Lilacs, Web of Science, and Scopus) considering the period of publication until the year 2017, and only 14 corresponded the inclusion criteria established for this systematic review. The main parameters of the PBM were expressed in Table 1. In addition, it was possible to observe the use of two different wavelengths (red and infrared), which are considered therapeutic. Most of the evaluated articles presented positive results that describe a greater amount of neoformed bone, an increase in collagen synthesis, and a contribution to microvascular reestablishment. However, two studies report no effect on the repair process when the PBM was used. In addition, we observed considerable variations between the values of power, fluence, and total energy, which make it difficult to compare the results presented between the selected studies. It was possible to conclude that the infrared laser was more effective in positively stimulating the bone repair process of critical defects. Furthermore, a discrepancy was found in the parameter values used, which made it difficult to choose the best protocol for the treatment of this type of lesion.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyAnimalsLasersRatsSkullBoneCritical bone defectsPhotobiomodulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.