Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291404›Full record

SynthesisPediatric surgery international2018

Comparison of major complications in children after laparoscopy-assisted gastrostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement: a meta-analysis.

Filip Sandberg, Margrét Brands Viktorsdóttir, Martin Salö, Pernilla Stenström, Einar Arnbjörnsson

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Celiac disease poses significant risk in developing depression, anxiety, headache, epilepsy, panic disorder, dysthymia: A meta-analysis.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances and challenges of gastrostomy insertion in children.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023
    Review
  14. Complications of Gastrostomy and Gastrojejunostomy: The Prevalence in Children.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Filip SandbergDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Margrét Brands ViktorsdóttirDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Martin SalöDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Pernilla StenströmDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Einar ArnbjörnssonDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. einar.arnbjornsson@telia.com.
Skåne University Hospital · SELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA meta-analysis was performed to compare the rates of the major complications associated with two gastrostomy tube placement techniques in a pediatric population: laparoscopy-assisted gastrostomy (LAG) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).

methodsThe PubMed electronic database was queried for comparative studies of the two insertion techniques. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used for the assessment of the quality and risk of bias in the included studies. The main outcome measure was the frequency of major complications defined as the need for reoperation within 30 days or death. RevMan 5.3, was used, with a p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

resultsEight studies including 1550 patients met the inclusion criteria. The risk for major complications was higher in PEG than in LAG 3.86 (95% confidence interval 1.90-7.81; p < 0.0002). The number needed to treat to reduce one major complication by performing LAG instead of PEG was 23. There were no randomized-controlled trials. Overall, the quality of the included studies was determined to be unsatisfactory.

conclusionsPEG placement was associated with a significantly higher risk of major complications compared to LAG placement. Therefore, LAG should be the preferred method for gastrostomy tube placement in children.

Indexed as

ChildEnteral NutritionGastrostomyGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceLaparoscopyOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostoperative ComplicationsSecond-Look SurgeryComplicationsGastrostomy in childrenLaparoscopy-assisted gastrostomyMeta-analysesPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Identifiers

PMID30291404
PMCPMC6244983
OpenAlexW2895618386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.