Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291328›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2019

Pangenomic comparison of globally distributed Poribacteria associated with sponge hosts and marine particles.

Sheila Podell, Jessica M Blanton, Alexander Neu, Vinayak Agarwal, Jason S Biggs, Bradley S Moore, Eric E Allen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Candidatus List No. 6.International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Bacteria Isolated From the Antarctic SpongeFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Harnessing the sponge microbiome for industrial biocatalysts.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheila PodellMarine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7073-5190
Jessica M BlantonMarine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1653-7836
Alexander NeuDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.
Vinayak AgarwalSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jason S BiggsUniversity of Guam Marine Laboratory, UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam, USA.
Bradley S MooreCenter for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4652-1253
Eric E AllenMarine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA. eallen@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1229-8794
Scripps Institution of Oceanography · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Guam · GU

Funding

Sources and Sins of Halogenated Organic Compounds in the Marine EnvironmentP01ES021921 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MOORE, BRADLEY S · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES021921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidatus Poribacteria is a little-known bacterial phylum, previously characterized by partial genomes from a single sponge host, but never isolated in culture. We have reconstructed multiple genome sequences from four different sponge genera and compared them to recently reported, uncharacterized Poribacteria genomes from the open ocean, discovering shared and unique functional characteristics. Two distinct, habitat-linked taxonomic lineages were identified, designated Entoporibacteria (sponge-associated) and Pelagiporibacteria (free-living). These lineages differed in flagellar motility and chemotaxis genes unique to Pelagiporibacteria, and highly expanded families of restriction endonucleases, DNA methylases, transposases, CRISPR repeats, and toxin-antitoxin gene pairs in Entoporibacteria. Both lineages shared pathways for facultative anaerobic metabolism, denitrification, fermentation, organosulfur compound utilization, type IV pili, cellulosomes, and bacterial proteosomes. Unexpectedly, many features characteristic of eukaryotic host association were also shared, including genes encoding the synthesis of eukaryotic-like cell adhesion molecules, extracellular matrix digestive enzymes, phosphoinositol-linked membrane glycolipids, and exopolysaccharide capsules. Complete Poribacteria 16S rRNA gene sequences were found to contain multiple mismatches to "universal" 16S rRNA gene primer sets, substantiating concerns about potential amplification failures in previous studies. A newly designed primer set corrects these mismatches, enabling more accurate assessment of Poribacteria abundance in diverse marine habitats where it may have previously been overlooked.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimal DistributionAnimalsBacteriaPoriferaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30291328
PMCPMC6331548
OpenAlexW2895612405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.