ArticleNature reviews. Neuroscience2018
Author Correction: The emerging field of epigenetics in neurodegeneration and neuroprotection.
Article in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Epigenetics of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a systematic review.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Distinct DNA hydroxymethylation landscape and mitochondrial DNA rearrangement signatures induced by single- and multi-fraction alpha particle radiation in lung fibroblasts.Environmental epigenetics · 2026Article
- Review
- An Overview of the Epigenetic Modifications in the Brain under Normal and Pathological Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Functional Interplay between Methyltransferases and Inflammasomes in Inflammatory Responses and Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The Dynamic Partnership of Polycomb and Trithorax in Brain Development and Diseases.Epigenomes · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Box 1 of this article, the positioning of the amino acid residues on the tail of histone H3 in part b of the figure was incorrect. These should have been oriented so that the K4 residue was the most distal labelled residue from the nucleosome core region. The corrected figure is shown below. The authors and editors thank T. Brown, R. Lober and C. Waker for bringing this error to our attention.
Identifiers
30291299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.