Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291271›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Dual Porosity Protein-based Scaffolds with Enhanced Cell Infiltration and Proliferation.

Morteza Rasoulianboroujeni, Nasim Kiaie, Fahimeh Sadat Tabatabaei, Amir Yadegari, Farahnaz Fahimipour, Kimia Khoshroo, Lobat Tayebi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Application of polydopamine-modified triphasic PLA/PCL-PLGA/Mg(OH)Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  11. Plant Cellulose as a Substrate for 3D Neural Stem Cell Culture.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Development of fibroblast/endothelial cell-seeded collagen scaffolds for in vitro prevascularization.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Morteza RasoulianboroujeniMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA. Morteza.rasoulianboroujeni@marquette.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3314-1550
Nasim KiaieDepartment of Tissue Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Fahimeh Sadat TabatabaeiMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5951-4853
Amir YadegariMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Farahnaz FahimipourMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Kimia KhoshrooMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Lobat TayebiMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA. lobat.tayebi@marquette.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1947-5658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D dual porosity protein-based scaffolds have been developed using the combination of foaming and freeze-drying. The suggested approach leads to the production of large, highly porous scaffolds with negligible shrinkage and deformation compared to the conventional freeze-drying method. Scanning electron microscopy, standard histological processing and mercury intrusion porosimetry confirmed the formation of a dual network in the form of big primary pores (243 ± 14 µm) embracing smaller secondary pores (42 ± 3 µm) opened onto their surface, resembling a vascular network. High interconnectivity of the pores, confirmed by micro-CT, is shown to improve diffusion kinetics and support a relatively uniform distribution of isolated human dental pulp stem cells within the scaffold compared to conventional scaffolds. Dual network scaffolds indicate more than three times as high cell proliferation capability as conventional scaffolds in 14 days.

Identifiers

PMID30291271
PMCPMC6173780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.