Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30291100›Full record

ArticleJMIR diabetes2017

Web-Based Weight Loss Intervention for Men With Type 2 Diabetes: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anna Haste, Ashley J Adamson, Elaine McColl, Vera Araujo-Soares, Ruth Bell

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR diabetes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03788915 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Facilitating Weight Loss and Reversing Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) by Means of a Collaborative eHealth Lifestyle Coaching Intervention in Primary Care - A 2-year Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2018 to 2021Enrolled340ConditionsObesityArmsOnline dietetic lifestyle counseling, Usual care
NCT04880005 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Protocol for the Digital, Individualized, and Collaborative Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in General Practice Based on Decision Aid (DICTA) - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2021 to 2025Enrolled400ConditionsDiabetes type2ArmsClinical decision support, Digital Lifestyle Coaching, Integration to Standard Electronic Health Record
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna HasteInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5001-0763
Ashley J AdamsonInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3735-2846
Elaine McCollInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8300-3204
Vera Araujo-SoaresInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4044-2527
Ruth BellInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8464-8933
Newcastle University · GBUnited Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-001Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRising obesity levels remain a major public health concern due to the clear link with several comorbidities such as diabetes. Diabetes now affects 6% of the UK population. Modest weight loss of 5% to 10% has been shown to be associated with significant reductions in blood sugar, lipid, and blood pressure levels. Men have been shown to be attracted to programs that do not require extensive face-to-face time commitments, illustrating the potential audience available for health behavior change via the Web.

objectiveThe objective of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a Web-based weight loss intervention in men with type 2 diabetes.

methodsWe conducted a pilot, parallel 2-arm, individually randomized controlled trial with embedded process evaluation. Participants were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to the usual care group or the 12-month Web-based weight loss intervention, including dietitian and exercise expert feedback. Face-to-face recruitment and assessment were performed by the researcher unblinded. Data collected included weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference, together with an audit trail of eligibility, recruitment, retention, and adherence rates. A process evaluation (website use data and qualitative interviews) monitored adherence, acceptability, and feasibility of the intervention.

resultsGeneral practice database searches achieved the recruitment target (n=61) for the population of men with type 2 diabetes, of whom 66% (40/61) completed 3-month follow-up measurements. By 12 months, the retention rate was 52% (32/61), with 12 of the 33 men allocated to the intervention group still active on the website. The intervention was seen as acceptable by the majority of participants. We gained insights about acceptability and use of the website from the parallel process evaluation.

conclusionsRecruitment to the Web-based weight loss intervention was successful. Results are descriptive, but there were positive indications of increased weight loss (in kilograms and as a percentage), and reduced waist circumference and BMI for the intervention group from 3 to 12 months, in comparison with control. This research adds to the evidence base in relation to incorporating a Web-based weight loss intervention within the UK National Health Service (NHS). NHS weight loss services are struggling to provide sufficient referrals. Therefore, alternative modes of delivery, with the potential to reduce health professional input and time per patient while still enabling individual and tailored care, need to be investigated to identify whether they can be effective and thus benefit the NHS.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 48086713; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN48086713 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6rO4xSlhI).

Indexed as

diabetes mellitus, type 2feasibility studiesmenmen's healthpilot projectspilot RCTprocess evaluationrandomized controlled trialtype 2 diabetesWeb-based interventionweight loss

Identifiers

PMID30291100
PMCPMC6238853
OpenAlexW2727418883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.