ArticleJMIR diabetes2017
Views of Patients on Using mHealth to Monitor and Prevent Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR diabetes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Facilitators and barriers of using digital technology for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: A qualitative systematic review.International wound journal · 2020Pooled it
- The co-creation of Foot Selfie, a patient-centered mobile intervention to prevent diabetic foot ulcers.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Self-Monitoring Risk Factors for Diabetic Foot Ulceration With the Feetchecker App: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Exploring mHealth app utilization for diabetes self-management: survey insights from a northern district in Malaysia.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Empowering Foot Care Literacy Among People Living With Diabetes and Their Carers With an mHealth App: Protocol for a Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Perceptions of Australians with diabetes-related foot disease on requirements for effective secondary prevention.The Australian journal of rural health · 2023Article
- How patients with diabetic foot ulcers experience telemedicine solutions: A scoping review.International wound journal · 2023Article
- Self-Monitoring Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers with the MyFootCare App: A Mixed Methods Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Risk profiling in the prevention and treatment of chronic wounds using artificial intelligence.International wound journal · 2022Article
- Review
- The patient's perspective of diabetic foot ulceration: A phenomenological exploration of causes, detection and care seeking.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Article
- The Costs and Cardiovascular Benefits in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease From a Fourth-Generation Synchronous Telehealth Program: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Mobile Health-Based Thermometer for Monitoring Wound Healing After Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Chronic Foot Ulcer: Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
- PATIENTS' AND PHYSICIANS' PERSPECTIVES ABOUT USING HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN DIABETES MANAGEMENT IN IRAN: A QUALITATIVE STUDY.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2021Article
- The Potential Role of Sensors, Wearables and Telehealth in the Remote Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Foot thermometry with mHeath-based supplementation to prevent diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial.Wellcome open research · 2020Article
- Work ability and productivity in patients with diabetic foot.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2019Article
- Promoting Self-Care of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Through a Mobile Phone App: User-Centered Design and Evaluation.JMIR diabetes · 2018Article
- Article
- mHealth Apps as Effective Persuasive Health Technology: Contextualizing the "Necessary" Functionalities.JMIR nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with diabetes are at risk for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), which can lead to limb loss and a significant decrease in quality of life. Evidence suggests that mHealth can be an effective tool in diabetes self-management. mHealth presents an opportunity for the prevention and monitoring of DFUs. However, there is a paucity of research that explores its effectiveness in the DFU patient population, as well as the views and attitudes of these patients toward technology and mHealth.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the views, attitudes, and experiences of a diabetic patient population with or at risk of DFUs regarding technology, mHealth, and the diabetic foot.
methodsWe used a qualitative research approach using in-depth interviews with 8 patients with DFUs. Questions were structured around experience with technology, current health practices related to diabetic foot care, and thoughts on using an mHealth device that prevents and monitors DFUs. We transcribed and thematically analyzed all interviews.
resultsAll patients had positive responses for an mHealth intervention aimed at preventing and monitoring DFUs. We found 4 themes in the data: diversity in use of technology, feet-checking habits, 2-way communication with health care professionals (HCPs), and functionality. There were varying levels of familiarity with and dependence on technology within this patient population. These relationships correlated with distinct generations found in North America, including baby boomers and Generation X. Furthermore, we found that most patients performed daily feet checks to monitor any changes in health. However, some did not perform feet checks prior to the development of a DFU. Patients expressed interest in 2-way communication with HCPs that would allow for easier appointment scheduling, sharing of medical data, decreased number of visits, and use of alerts for when medical attention is required. Patients also identified conditions of functionality for the mHealth intervention. These included consideration of debilitating complications because of diabetes, such as retinopathy and decreased mobility; ease of use of the intervention; and implementation of virtual communities to support continued use of the intervention.
conclusionsOur patient population expressed an interest in mHealth for preventing and monitoring DFUs, although some participants were not frequent users of technology. mHealth continues to show potential in improving patient outcomes, and this study provides a foundation for designing interventions specific to a DFU population. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.