Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30290841›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2018

Evolutionary and developmental dynamics of sex-biased gene expression in common frogs with proto-Y chromosomes.

Wen-Juan Ma, Paris Veltsos, Roberto Sermier, Darren J Parker, Nicolas Perrin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolution of sex-biased genes inEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex chromosomes as supergenes of speciation: why amphibians defy the rules?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Sex-biased gene expression and recent sex chromosome turnover.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Sex-chromosome evolution in frogs: what role for sex-antagonistic genes?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A bird-like genome from a frog: Mechanisms of genome size reduction in the ornate burrowing frog,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wen-Juan MaDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. wenjuanma84@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2585-6406
Paris VeltsosDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Roberto SermierDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Darren J ParkerDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas PerrinDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHAmherst College · USSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe patterns of gene expression on highly differentiated sex chromosomes differ drastically from those on autosomes, due to sex-specific patterns of selection and inheritance. As a result, X chromosomes are often enriched in female-biased genes (feminization) and Z chromosomes in male-biased genes (masculinization). However, it is not known how quickly sexualization of gene expression and transcriptional degeneration evolve after sex-chromosome formation. Furthermore, little is known about how sex-biased gene expression varies throughout development.

resultsWe sample a population of common frogs (Rana temporaria) with limited sex-chromosome differentiation (proto-sex chromosome), leaky genetic sex determination evidenced by the occurrence of XX males, and delayed gonadal development, meaning that XY individuals may first develop ovaries before switching to testes. Using high-throughput RNA sequencing, we investigate the dynamics of gene expression throughout development, spanning from early embryo to froglet stages. Our results show that sex-biased expression affects different genes at different developmental stages and increases during development, reaching highest levels in XX female froglets. Additionally, sex-biased gene expression depends on phenotypic, rather than genotypic sex, with similar expression in XX and XY males; correlates with gene evolutionary rates; and is not localized to the proto-sex chromosome nor near the candidate sex-determining gene Dmrt1.

conclusionsThe proto-sex chromosome of common frogs does not show evidence of sexualization of gene expression, nor evidence for a faster rate of evolution. This challenges the notion that sexually antagonistic genes play a central role in the initial stages of sex-chromosome evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomeGenotypeMalePhenotypeRana temporariaTranscriptomeY ChromosomeDevelopmentEvolutionary rateFaster-X effectGene expressionProto-sex chromosomeSex biasSex reversalsSexualizationSexually antagonistic genesTranscriptional degeneration

Identifiers

PMID30290841
PMCPMC6173898
OpenAlexW2895568133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.