ArticleBMC infectious diseases2018
An enhanced regimen as post-exposure chemoprophylaxis for leprosy: PEP+.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Detection of anti-M. leprae antibodies in children in leprosy-endemic areas: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Acceptability and feasibility of chemoprophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin in four leprosy-endemic districts in Benin.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- The PEP++ study protocol: a cluster-randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of an enhanced regimen of post-exposure prophylaxis for close contacts of persons affected by leprosy to prevent disease transmission.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Leprosy: treatment, prevention, immune response and gene function.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Policy and Executive Barriers in Preventing and Eradicating Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.International journal of preventive medicine · 2024Review
- Field-friendly anti-PGL-I serosurvey in children to monitorFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Identifying clusters of leprosy patients in India: A comparison of methods.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Pathogenicity and virulence ofVirulence · 2022Review
- Responding to the post-pandemic crisis: post-exposure prophylaxis for TB.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022Article
- Leprosy chemoprophylaxis of household contacts: A survey of Canadian infectious disease and tropical medicine specialists.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2022Article
- A 5-year evaluation of chemoprophylactic treatment in elementary school children with subclinical leprosy.Biomedical reports · 2021Article
- Treatment and Evaluation Advances in Leprosy Neuropathy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021Review
- Leprosy postexposure prophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin: Nepalese dermatologist's dilemma.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Article
- A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2020Article
- Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) efficacy of rifampin, rifapentine, moxifloxacin, minocycline, and clarithromycin in a susceptible-subclinical model of leprosy.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
- Genomic Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- The State of Affairs in Post-Exposure Leprosy Prevention: A Descriptive Meta-Analysis on Immuno- and Chemo-Prophylaxis.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2020Review
- Protocol, rationale and design of PEOPLE (Post ExpOsure Prophylaxis for LEprosy in the Comoros and Madagascar): a cluster randomized trial on effectiveness of different modalities of implementation of post-exposure prophylaxis of leprosy contacts.BMC infectious diseases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The ongoing transmission of Mycobacterium (M.) leprae reflected in a very slow decline in leprosy incidence, forces us to be innovative and conduct cutting-edge research. Single dose rifampicin (SDR) as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for contacts of leprosy patients, reduces their risk to develop leprosy by 60%. This is a promising new preventive measure that can be integrated into routine leprosy control programmes, as is being demonstrated in the Leprosy Post-Exposure Programme that is currently ongoing in eight countries.The limited (60%) effectiveness of SDR is likely due to the fact that some contacts have a preclinical infection beyond the early stages for which SDR is not sufficient to prevent the development of clinical signs and symptoms of leprosy. An enhanced regimen, more potent against a higher load of leprosy bacteria, would increase the effectiveness of this preventive measure significantly.The Netherlands Leprosy Relief (NLR) is developing a multi-country study aiming to show that breaking the chain of transmission of M. leprae is possible, evidenced by a dramatic reduction in incidence. In this study the assessment of the effectiveness of an enhanced prophylactic regimen for leprosy is an important component. To define the so called PEP++ regimen for this intervention study, NLR convened an Expert Meeting that was attended by clinical leprologists, public health experts, pharmacologists, dermatologists and microbiologists.The Expert Meeting advised on combinations of available drugs, with known efficacy against leprosy, as well as on the duration of the intake, aiming at a risk reduction of 80-90%. To come to a conclusion the Expert Meeting considered the bactericidal, sterilising and bacteriostatic activity of the potential drugs. The criteria used to determine an optimal enhanced regimen were: effectiveness, safety, acceptability, availability, affordability, feasibility and not inducing drug resistance.The Expert Meeting concluded that the enhanced regimen for the PEP++ study should comprise three standard doses of rifampicin 600 mg (weight adjusted when given to children) plus moxifloxacin 400 mg given at four-weekly intervals. For children and for adults with contraindications for moxifloxacin, moxifloxacin should be replaced by clarithromycin 300 mg (weight adjusted).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.