Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30290790›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2018

An enhanced regimen as post-exposure chemoprophylaxis for leprosy: PEP+.

Liesbeth F Mieras, Anna T Taal, Wim H van Brakel, Emmanuelle Cambau, Paul R Saunderson, W Cairns S Smith, Cita Rosita S Prakoeswa, Linda Astari, David M Scollard, Dejair Caitano do Nascimento and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Responding to the post-pandemic crisis: post-exposure prophylaxis for TB.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Article
  11. Leprosy chemoprophylaxis of household contacts: A survey of Canadian infectious disease and tropical medicine specialists.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Treatment and Evaluation Advances in Leprosy Neuropathy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Liesbeth F MierasNetherlands Leprosy Relief, Amsterdam, Netherlands. L.Mieras@Leprastichting.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-1712
Anna T TaalNetherlands Leprosy Relief, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Wim H van BrakelNetherlands Leprosy Relief, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Emmanuelle CambauNational Reference Center for mycobacteria and antimycobacterial resistance, Paris, France.
Paul R SaundersonAmerican Leprosy Missions, Greenville, USA.
W Cairns S SmithInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
Cita Rosita S PrakoeswaDermatology Health & Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Linda AstariDermatology Health & Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.
David M ScollardNational Hansen's Disease Programs, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Dejair Caitano do NascimentoInstituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru (SP), Brazil.
Jacques GrossetJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Hemanta K KarDepartment of Dermatology, Leprosy and STD, Paras Hospitals, Gurgaon, India.
Shinzo IzumiLeprosy Study Group, Institute of Tropical Disease, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Laura GilliniGlobal Leprosy Programme, WHO, New Delhi, India.
Marcos C L VirmondInstituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru (SP), Brazil.
Marieke G G SturkenboomDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Airlangga University · IDNetherlands Leprosy Relief · NLInstituto Lauro de Souza Lima · BRAmerican Leprosy Missions · USCNR de la Résistance aux Antibiotiques · FRJohns Hopkins University · USNational Hansen's Disease Program · USParas Hospitals · INUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Aberdeen · GBWorld Health Organization - India · IN

Funding

Netherlands Leprosy Relief none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing transmission of Mycobacterium (M.) leprae reflected in a very slow decline in leprosy incidence, forces us to be innovative and conduct cutting-edge research. Single dose rifampicin (SDR) as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for contacts of leprosy patients, reduces their risk to develop leprosy by 60%. This is a promising new preventive measure that can be integrated into routine leprosy control programmes, as is being demonstrated in the Leprosy Post-Exposure Programme that is currently ongoing in eight countries.The limited (60%) effectiveness of SDR is likely due to the fact that some contacts have a preclinical infection beyond the early stages for which SDR is not sufficient to prevent the development of clinical signs and symptoms of leprosy. An enhanced regimen, more potent against a higher load of leprosy bacteria, would increase the effectiveness of this preventive measure significantly.The Netherlands Leprosy Relief (NLR) is developing a multi-country study aiming to show that breaking the chain of transmission of M. leprae is possible, evidenced by a dramatic reduction in incidence. In this study the assessment of the effectiveness of an enhanced prophylactic regimen for leprosy is an important component. To define the so called PEP++ regimen for this intervention study, NLR convened an Expert Meeting that was attended by clinical leprologists, public health experts, pharmacologists, dermatologists and microbiologists.The Expert Meeting advised on combinations of available drugs, with known efficacy against leprosy, as well as on the duration of the intake, aiming at a risk reduction of 80-90%. To come to a conclusion the Expert Meeting considered the bactericidal, sterilising and bacteriostatic activity of the potential drugs. The criteria used to determine an optimal enhanced regimen were: effectiveness, safety, acceptability, availability, affordability, feasibility and not inducing drug resistance.The Expert Meeting concluded that the enhanced regimen for the PEP++ study should comprise three standard doses of rifampicin 600 mg (weight adjusted when given to children) plus moxifloxacin 400 mg given at four-weekly intervals. For children and for adults with contraindications for moxifloxacin, moxifloxacin should be replaced by clarithromycin 300 mg (weight adjusted).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinFluoroquinolonesHumansLeprosyMoxifloxacinNetherlandsPost-Exposure ProphylaxisRifampinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinFluoroquinolonesMoxifloxacinRifampinChemoprophylaxisClarithromycinIntervention studyLeprosyMoxifloxacinPost-exposure prophylaxisRifampicin

Identifiers

PMID30290790
PMCPMC6173927
OpenAlexW2895384053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.