Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30290639›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Role of qSOFA in predicting mortality of pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jianjun Jiang, Jin Yang, Yongmei Jin, Jiyu Cao, Youjin Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. qSOFA score poorly predicts critical progression in COVID-19 patients.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianjun JiangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University.
Jin YangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University.
Yongmei JinDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University.
Jiyu CaoThe Teaching Center for Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Youjin LuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University.
Anhui Medical University · CNSecond Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of sepsis was redefined recently, and a new screening system termed the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) was recommended for identifying infected patients at high risk for death. However, the predictive value of qSOFA for mortality in patients with pneumonia remains unclear. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis with the aim of determining the prognostic value of qSOFA in predicting mortality in patients with pneumonia.

methodsEmbase, Google Scholar, and PubMed (up to March 2018) were searched for related articles. We constructed a 2 × 2 contingency table according to mortality and qSOFA scores (<2 and ≥2) in patients with pneumonia. Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed study eligibility. A bivariate meta-analysis model was used to determine the prognostic value of qSOFA in predicting mortality. I index and Q-test were used to assess heterogeneity.

resultsSix studies with 17,868 patients were included. A qSOFA score ≥2 was related to a higher risk for death in patients with pneumonia, with a pooled risk ratio (RR) was 3.35 (95% CI, 2.24-5.01) using a random-effects model (I = 89.4%). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of a qSOFA score ≥2 to predict mortality in patients with pneumonia were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.33-0.53) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.76-0.92), respectively. The diagnostic OR was 4 (95% CI, 3-6). The area under the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63-0.71). When we calculated the community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) subgroup, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.36 (95% CI, 0.26-0.48) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.95), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.66-0.74).

conclusionsA qSOFA score ≥2 is strongly associated with mortality in patients with pneumonia, but the poor sensitivity of qSOFA may have limitations in the early identification of mortality in patients with pneumonia.

Indexed as

Organ Dysfunction ScoresCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCross InfectionHumansPneumoniaPredictive Value of TestsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID30290639
PMCPMC6200542
OpenAlexW2895103956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.