Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30290131›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2019

Caring for Critically Ill Patients in Humanitarian Settings.

James S Lee, Simon W P Roberts, Kanya Götsch, Ulrike Moeller, Laura Hawryluck

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Respiratory Emergencies in Disasters: A Narrative Review.Thoracic research and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Real-world clinical experience with the percutaneous extracorporeal life support system: Results from the German LifebridgeClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

James S Lee1 Medical Department, Médecins Sans Frontières-Operational Centre Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0173-9769
Simon W P Roberts1 Medical Department, Médecins Sans Frontières-Operational Centre Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Kanya Götsch1 Medical Department, Médecins Sans Frontières-Operational Centre Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Ulrike Moeller1 Medical Department, Médecins Sans Frontières-Operational Centre Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Laura Hawryluck2 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and.
Médecins Sans Frontières · BEUniversity of Toronto · CAAccadis Hochschule Bad Homburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical care medicine is far from the first medical field to come to mind when humanitarian action is mentioned, yet both critical care and humanitarian action share a fundamental purpose to save the lives and ease the suffering of people caught in acute crises. Critically ill children and adults will be present regardless of resource limitations and irrespective of geography, regional or cultural contexts, insecurity, or socioeconomic status, and they may be even more prevalent in a humanitarian crisis. Critical care is not limited to the walls of a hospital, and all hospitals will have critically ill patients regardless of designating a specific ward an ICU. Regular and consistent consideration of critical care principles in humanitarian settings provides crucial guidance to intensivists and nonintensivists alike. A multidisciplinary, systematic approach to patient care that encourages critical thinking, checklists that encourage communication among team members, and context-specific critical care rapid response teams are examples of critical care constructs that can provide high-quality critical care in all environments. Promoting critical care principles conveys the message that critical care is an integral part of health care and should be accessible to all, no matter the setting. These principles can be effectively adopted in humanitarian settings by normalizing them to everyday clinical practice. Equally, core humanitarian principles-dignity, accountability, impartiality, neutrality-can be applied to critical care. Applying principles of critical care in a context-specific manner and applying humanitarian principles to critical care can improve the quality of patient care and transcend barriers to resource limitations.

Indexed as

Relief WorkChecklistCritical CareCritical IllnessHealth Services AccessibilityHospital Rapid Response TeamHumansPatient Care TeamResuscitationTerminal Carecritical carehumanitarian actionintensive care

Identifiers

PMID30290131
PMCPMC6677375
OpenAlexW2895244245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.