Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30290130›Full record

SynthesisJournal of dental research2019

Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

O Urquhart, M P Tampi, L Pilcher, R L Slayton, M W B Araujo, M Fontana, S Guzmán-Armstrong, M M Nascimento, B B Nový, N Tinanoff and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of dental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06608563 (The Effect of an Adhesive System on the Retention and Caries Prevention for Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars), which is not on this map. Cited by 116 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06608563 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of an Adhesive System on the Retention and Caries Prevention for Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars: a 2-year Randomised Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Dublin, Trinity CollegeRan2024 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsDental Caries, Fissure SealantArmsFissure sealant without adhesive system (NO BOND), Fissure sealant with adhesive system (BOND)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Glass ionomer fissure sealants versus fluoride varnish application on children's behaviour: a randomised controlled trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Is Silver Diamine Fluoride Effective in Arresting Enamel Caries? A Randomized Clinical Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

O Urquhart1 Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry, Science Institute, American Dental Association, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0517-1266
M P Tampi1 Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry, Science Institute, American Dental Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
L Pilcher1 Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry, Science Institute, American Dental Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
R L Slayton2 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
M W B Araujo3 Science Institute, American Dental Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
M Fontana4 Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
S Guzmán-Armstrong5 Advance Education Program in Operative Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
M M Nascimento6 Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
B B Nový7 DentaQuest Institute and DentaQuest Oral Health Center, Westborough, MA, USA.
N Tinanoff8 Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
R J Weyant9 Department of Dental Public Health and Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
M S Wolff10 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
D A Young11 Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA.
D T Zero12 Department of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Oral Health Research Institute, School of Dentistry Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
R Brignardello-Petersen13 Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
L Banfield14 Health Sciences Library, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
A Parikh15 College of Dental Medicine, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
G Joshi16 GC America, Alsip, IL, USA.
A Carrasco-Labra1 Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry, Science Institute, American Dental Association, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of nonrestorative or non- and microinvasive caries treatment (fluoride- and nonfluoride-based interventions) is to manage the caries disease process at a lesion level and minimize the loss of sound tooth structure. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence on nonrestorative treatments for the outcomes of 1) arrest or reversal of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions on primary and permanent teeth and 2) adverse events. We included parallel and split-mouth randomized controlled trials where patients were followed for any length of time. Studies were identified with MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Pairs of reviewers independently conducted the selection of studies, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and assessment of the certainty in the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were synthesized with a random effects model and a frequentist approach. Forty-four trials (48 reports) were eligible, which included 7,378 participants and assessed the effect of 22 interventions in arresting or reversing noncavitated or cavitated carious lesions. Four network meta-analyses suggested that sealants + 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish, resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish, and 5,000-ppm F (1.1% NaF) toothpaste or gel were the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated occlusal, approximal, and noncavitated and cavitated root carious lesions on primary and/or permanent teeth, respectively (low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Study-level data indicated that 5% NaF varnish was the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated facial/lingual carious lesions (low certainty) and that 38% silver diamine fluoride solution applied biannually was the most effective for arresting advanced cavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface (moderate to high certainty). Preventing the onset of caries is the ultimate goal of a caries management plan. However, if the disease is present, there is a variety of effective interventions to treat carious lesions nonrestoratively.

Indexed as

Dental CariesPit and Fissure SealantsDentition, PermanentHumansTooth, DeciduousPit and Fissure Sealantscariesdental public healthevidence-based dentistry/health caregeriatric dentistrypediatric dentistrysystematic reviews and evidence-based dentistry

Identifiers

PMID30290130
PMCPMC6304695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.