Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30290052›Full record

SynthesisPain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2019

Effectiveness of Primary Care Interventions Using a Biopsychosocial Approach in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Reni M A van Erp, Ivan P J Huijnen, Marluuke L G Jakobs, Jos Kleijnen, Rob J E M Smeets

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06306833 (Psychophysiological Biomarkers to Assess the Effectiveness of Surface EMG Biofeedback as an Alternative Therapy to Reduce Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06306833 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Psychophysiological Biomarkers to Assess the Effectiveness of Surface EMG Biofeedback as an Alternative Therapy to Reduce Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmaila Fazal [afazal]Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsChronic Low Back PainArmsSurface Electromyography (sEMG) Biofeedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Integrative Treatment Strategies for Chronic Back Pain: A Literature Review with Clinical Recommendations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What Predicts a Longer Period of Pain in Patients Referred to an Interdisciplinary Center for Pain Care?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Reni M A van ErpDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ivan P J HuijnenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marluuke L G JakobsFaculty of Health, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Jos KleijnenDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rob J E M SmeetsDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLAdelante · NLLibra Revalidatie & Audiologie · NLZuyd University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

AdelanteCentre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology Hoensbroek, The Netherlands SAS-2012-01300CZ Foundation AFVV12-205The Province of Limburg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveRecent systematic reviews show promising effects for multidisciplinary biopsychosocial (BPS) interventions in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Nowadays, BPS interventions have also been developed for primary care physiotherapy settings. Our aim was to systematically review the evidence on the effectiveness of primary care BPS interventions in improving functional disability, pain, and work status for patients with CLBP. Secondly, we aimed to provide an elaborated overview of BPS intervention designs, physiotherapist training programs, and process-related factors (practical implementation).

methodsWe searched in scientific databases and reference lists. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating primary care physiotherapist-led BPS interventions in adults (≥18 years) with nonspecific CLBP (≥12 weeks) were included.

resultsOur search resulted in 943 references; 7 RCTs were included (1,426 participants). Results show moderate-quality evidence (3 trials; 991 participants) that a BPS intervention is more effective than education/advice for reducing disability and pain in the short, medium, and long term. Low-quality evidence (4 trials; 435 participants) was found for no difference with physical activity treatments.

conclusionsBPS interventions seem more effective than education/advice and were found to be as effective as physical activity interventions in patients with CLBP. BPS interventions with a clear focus on psychosocial factors (understanding pain, unhelpful thoughts, coping styles, and goal setting) seem most promising. Sufficient delivery of BPS elements is expected when physiotherapists participate in training programs with extensive support prior and during delivery (manual, supervision, and informative resources).

Indexed as

AdultChronic PainHumansLow Back PainPain ManagementPrimary Health Carebiopsychosocial interventionchronic painlow back painphysiotherapyprimary health caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30290052
PMCPMC7379915
OpenAlexW2894890448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.