Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30289928›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Parenting behaviors that shape child compliance: A multilevel meta-analysis.

Patty Leijten, Frances Gardner, G J Melendez-Torres, Wendy Knerr, Geertjan Overbeek

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Practitioners' Use and Acceptability of Time-Out.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Using Non-Violent Discipline Tools: Evidence Suggesting the Importance of Attunement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patty LeijtenUniversity of Oxford, Centre for Evidence-based Intervention, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8828-4049
Frances GardnerUniversity of Oxford, Centre for Evidence-based Intervention, Oxford, United Kingdom.
G J Melendez-TorresWarwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Wendy KnerrUniversity of Oxford, Centre for Evidence-based Intervention, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Geertjan OverbeekUniversity of Amsterdam, Research Institute of Child Development and Education & Research Priority Area YIELD, University of Amsterdam, NG Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU14Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhat are the parenting behaviors that shape child compliance? Most research on parent-child interactions relies on correlational research or evaluations of "package deal" interventions that manipulate many aspects of parenting at the same time. Neither approach allows for identifying the specific parenting behaviors that shape child compliance. To overcome this, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed available evidence on the effects of experimentally manipulated, discrete parenting behaviors-a niche in parent-child interaction research that contributes unique information on the specific parenting behaviors that shape child behavior.

methodsWe identified studies by systematically searching databases and through contacting experts. Nineteen studies (75 effect sizes) on four discrete parenting behaviors were included: praise, verbal reprimands, time-out, and ignore. In multilevel models, we tested for each parenting behavior whether it increased child compliance, including both observed and parent-reported measures of child compliance.

resultsProviding "time-out" for noncompliance robustly increased both observed and parent-reported child compliance (ds = 0.84-1.72; 95% CI 0.30 to 2.54). The same holds for briefly ignoring the child after non-compliance (ds = 0.36-1.77; 95% CI 0.04 to 2.90). When observed and parent-reported outcomes were combined, but not when they were examined separately, verbal reprimands also increased child compliance (d = 0.72; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.19). Praise did not increase child compliance (ds = -0.27-1.19; 95% CI -2.04 to 1.59).

conclusionOur findings suggest that of the discrete parenting behaviors that are experimentally studied in multiple trials, especially time-out and ignore, and to some extent verbal reprimands, shape child compliance.

Indexed as

Parent-Child RelationsAdolescentChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolChild RearingCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMultilevel AnalysisParenting

Identifiers

PMID30289928
PMCPMC6173420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.