For Smoking Cessation, E-Cigarette Flavors Aren't Required.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Effects of Nicotine Content and Preferred Flavor on Subjective Responses to E-cigarettes: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Laboratory Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
   Trial
2. Genes · 2023
   Article
3. #FlavorsSaveLives: An Analysis of Twitter Posts Opposing Flavored E-cigarette Bans.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Response to Letter From Ward-Peterson and Maziak, "For Smoking Cessation, E-Cigarette Flavors Aren't Required".2019
• Comment on
  E-cigarettes: Comparing the Possible Risks of Increasing Smoking Initiation with the Potential Benefits of Increasing Smoking Cessation.2019

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as