Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30289317›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2018

Cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Norway- The healthcare providers' perspectives.

Kathy Ainul Møen, Laura Terragni, Bernadette Kumar, Esperanza Diaz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathy Ainul Møena Department of Global Public Health and Primary care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.
Laura Terragnib Norwegian Center for Minority Health Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health , Oslo , Norway.
Bernadette Kumarb Norwegian Center for Minority Health Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health , Oslo , Norway.
Esperanza Diaza Department of Global Public Health and Primary care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.
University of Bergen · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore health care providers' (HCPs) experiences regarding cervical cancer screening (CCS) among immigrant women, their strategies to facilitate these consultations and their need for further information.

designExploratory qualitative design.

settingHCPs who perform CCS: general practitioners, midwives and private gynaecologists, working in Oslo, Norway. SUBJECTS: We interviewed 26 general practitioners, 3 midwives and 3 gynaecologists.

methodBoth focus groups and personal in depth semi structured interviews. Interview transcripts were analysed using a thematic analysis approach.

resultsSome of the HCPs' experiences related to CCS were common for all women regardless of their immigrant background, such as the understanding of routines and responsibilities for prevention. Aspects specific for immigrant women were mainly related to organization, language, health literacy levels, culture and gender. Several strategies targeting organizational (longer consultations), language (using interpreters), health literacy (using anatomy models to explain) and culture (dealing with the expression of pain) were reported. Most HCPs had not previously reflected upon specific challenges linked to CCS among immigrant women, thus the interviews were an eye-opener to some extent. HCPs acknowledged that they need more knowledge on immigrant women's' reproductive health.

conclusionHCPs' biases, stereotypes and assumptions could be a key provider-level barrier to low uptake of CCS test among immigrants if they remained unexplored and unchallenged. HCPs need more information on reproductive health of immigrant women in addition to cultural awareness. Key Points The participation rate of immigrant women to cervical cancer screening in Norway is low, compared to non-immigrants. This might be partly attributed to health care system and provider, and not only due to the women's preferences. Our focus groups and interviews among health care providers show, that in addition to cultural competence and awareness, they need knowledge on reproductive health of immigrants. We recommend an intervention targeting health care providers to close the gap in cervical cancer screening.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEarly Detection of CancerEmigrants and ImmigrantsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityAdultCultureFemaleFocus GroupsHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayProfessional CompetenceQualitative ResearchCervical cancer screeningemigrants and immigrantshealth care providersintervention

Identifiers

PMID30289317
PMCPMC6381537
OpenAlexW2894924248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.