ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019
Moving between ideologies in self-management support-A qualitative study.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Care Professionals' Experiences of Facilitating Patient Activation and Empowerment in Chronic Illness using a Person-Centered and Strengths-Based Self-Management Program.Chronic illness · 2023Article
- Article
- How do nurses support chronically ill clients' participation and self-management in primary care? A cross-country qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Experiences of self-management support in patients with diabetes and multimorbidity: a qualitative study in Norwegian general practice.Primary health care research & development · 2020Article
- Implementing Supported Self-Management in Community-Based Stroke Care: A Secondary Analysis of Nurses' Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Moving between ideologies in self-management support-A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReforms in current health policy explicitly endorse health promotion through group-based self-management support for people with long-term conditions. Health promotion and traditional medicine are based on different logics. Accordingly, health professionals in health-promoting settings demand the adoption of new practices and ways of thinking.
objectivesThe objective of our study was to investigate how health professionals perceive the health-promoting group-based self-management support that is politically initiated for people with long-term conditions.
designThis study had a qualitative research design that included focus group interviews and was guided by a social constructivist paradigm in which group-based self-management was viewed as a social construction. Different logics at play were analysed through the theoretical lens of institutional logic. Discussions among participants show frames of references seen as logics. SETTING AND
participantsWe recruited health professionals from group-based health-promoting measures for people with type 2 diabetes in Norway. Two focus groups comprising four and six participants each were invited to discuss the practices and value of health promotion through group-based self-management support.
resultsThe analysis resulted in three themes of discussion among participants that contained reflections of logics in movement. Health professionals' discussions moved between different logics based on the importance of expert-based knowledge on compliance and on individual lifestyle choices. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThe study indicates that health promotion through self-management support is still a field "in the making" and that professionals strive to establish new logics and practices that are not considered difficult to manage or do not contain incompatible understandings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.