ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2019
Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Octopamine and tyramine dynamics predict learning rate phenotypes during associative conditioning in honey bees.Science advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Reinforcement expectation in the honeybee (Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Gut microbiota contribute to variations in honey bee foraging intensity.The ISME journal · 2024Article
- Tyramine and itseLife · 2023Article
- Task-specific odorant receptor expression in worker antennae indicates that sensory filters regulate division of labor in ants.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Context specificity of latent inhibition in the snail Cornu aspersum.Animal cognition · 2022Article
- Article
- Interindividual variation in the use of social information during learning in honeybees.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Multidisciplinary analysis of Italian Alpine wildflower honey reveals criticalities, diversity and value.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Heritable Cognitive Phenotypes Influence Appetitive Learning but not Extinction in Honey Bees.Annals of the Entomological Society of America · 2021Article
- Leadership - not followership - determines performance in ant teams.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Search Behavior of Individual Foragers Involves Neurotransmitter Systems Characteristic for Social Scouting.Frontiers in insect science · 2021Article
- Early olfactory, but not gustatory processing, is affected by the selection of heritable cognitive phenotypes in honey bee.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021Article
- Octopamine and dopamine mediate waggle dance following and information use in honeybees.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Individual learning phenotypes drive collective behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Telescope: an interactive tool for managing large-scale analysis from mobile devices.GigaScience · 2020Article
- A Multiscale Review of Behavioral Variation in Collective Foraging Behavior in Honey Bees.Insects · 2019Review
- Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits.The Journal of animal ecology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals must effectively balance the time they spend exploring the environment for new resources and exploiting them. One way that social animals accomplish this balance is by allocating these two tasks to different individuals. In honeybees, foraging is divided between scouts, which tend to explore the landscape for novel resources, and recruits, which tend to exploit these resources. Exploring the variation in cognitive and physiological mechanisms of foraging behaviour will provide a deeper understanding of how the division of labour is regulated in social insect societies. Here, we uncover how honeybee foraging behaviour may be shaped by predispositions in performance of latent inhibition (LI), which is a form of non-associative learning by which individuals learn to ignore familiar information. We compared LI between scouts and recruits, hypothesizing that differences in learning would correlate with differences in foraging behaviour. Scouts seek out and encounter many new odours while locating novel resources, while recruits continuously forage from the same resource, even as its quality degrades. We found that scouts show stronger LI than recruits, possibly reflecting their need to discriminate forage quality. We also found that scouts have significantly elevated tyramine compared to recruits. Furthermore, after associative odour training, recruits have significantly diminished octopamine in their brains compared to scouts. These results suggest that individual variation in learning behaviour shapes the phenotypic behavioural differences between different types of honeybee foragers. These differences in turn have important consequences for how honeybee colonies interact with their environment. Uncovering the proximate mechanisms that influence individual variation in foraging behaviour is crucial for understanding the ecological context in which societies evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.