Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30289005›Full record

Trial reportIntegrative cancer therapies2018

Phase II Trial of Acai Juice Product in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Elizabeth R Kessler, Lih-Jen Su, Dexiang Gao, Kathleen C Torkko, Michael Wacker, Mary Anduha, Nicole Chronister, Paul Maroni, E David Crawford, Thomas W Flaig and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Integrative cancer therapies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Açaí (Nutrients · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Efficacy ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth R Kessler1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Lih-Jen Su1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Dexiang Gao1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kathleen C Torkko1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Michael Wacker1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Mary Anduha1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Nicole Chronister1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Paul Maroni1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
E David Crawford1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Thomas W Flaig1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
L Michael Glode1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Elaine T Lam1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Paul Calabresis Award in Clinical Oncology ResearchK12CA086913 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI VIRGINIA F. BORGES, Jill E Slansky · 2000 to 2026
$17.8M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA086913NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlant derivatives have been studied as therapies for prostate cancer based on their purported anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties and low toxicities. The acai berry is an example of a plant rich in phytochemicals, which may slow the growth of prostate cancer.

methodsThis was a phase II, Simon 2-stage clinical trial in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer with a primary endpoint of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Patients were asymptomatic, with a rising PSA of at least 0.2 ng/mL, and were treated with twice daily intake of Acai Juice Product until PSA progression, with a primary endpoint of PSA response.

resultsTwenty-one patients were enrolled in the first stage of the trial. One of those patients had a PSA response within the study time period. The PSA doubling time was lengthened in 71% of patients (95% confidence interval = 48% to 89%) on the trial, and in a small number of responders, this was sustained over an extended time.

conclusionsThis study did not meet its primary endpoint of 50% PSA response. Nevertheless, the overall tolerability and effects on PSA stabilization warrant further exploration in a biochemically recurrent population.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionEuterpeFruit and Vegetable JuicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPlant ExtractsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomePlant ExtractsProstate-Specific Antigenacaibiochemical recurrenceclinical trialnutraceuticalprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID30289005
PMCPMC6247557
OpenAlexW2895582640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.