Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288725›Full record

ReviewEating and weight disorders : EWD2018

Affect, reward, and punishment in anorexia nervosa: a narrative overview.

Margarita Sala, Amy H Egbert, Jason M Lavender, Andrea B Goldschmidt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06213883 (Characterizing Acute Exercise Response in Restrictive Eating Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06213883 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Characterizing Acute Exercise Response in Restrictive Eating Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2023 to 2025Enrolled74ConditionsEating DisordersArmsBiobehavioral Response to in-lab exposure to physical activity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Margarita SalaDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, PO Box 750442, Dallas, TX, 75206, USA. msala@smu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-9607
Amy H EgbertDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jason M LavenderDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.
Andrea B GoldschmidtDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center/The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

Affective and Neurocognitive Dimensions across Eating Disorder PsychopathologyK23MH101342 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LAVENDER, JASON MATTHEW · 2014 to 2018
$704k
Neurodevelopmental substrates of emotion regulation in obese, binge eating youthK23DK105234 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GOLDSCHMIDT, ANDREA BETH · 2015 to 2018
$673k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK105234NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH101342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious psychiatric disorder that is difficult to treat and often follows a protracted course. A number of theoretical models have been proposed for the etiology and maintenance of AN. Two domains that have received substantial attention in the literature on AN are affect and reward/punishment processes. However, despite an overlap in the nature and implications of these processes, studies of AN addressing these constructs have typically investigated them independently. PURPOSE: The purpose of this narrative review is to integrate the literature on the role of affect, reward, and punishment in AN.

methodWe provide a focused narrative overview of the literature relating to the affect, reward, and punishment in AN via a synthesis of recent reviews and meta-analyses.

resultsWe first describe several prominent affect and reward/punishment-based conceptualizations of AN, followed by a brief overview of the existing empirical literature in these domains.

conclusionWe provide a critical discussion of the disparate nature of these literatures in AN, including associated limitations. We then conclude with an extensive discussion of directions for future research that integrate the study of affect and reward/punishment processes in AN. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, narrative review.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalPunishmentRewardAffectAnorexia NervosaHumansAffectAnorexia nervosaEmotionPunishmentReward

Identifiers

PMID30288725
PMCPMC7479630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.