Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288598›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2019

Aquablation of the prostate: single-center results of a non-selected, consecutive patient cohort.

T Bach, I Giannakis, A Bachmann, C Fiori, Fernando Gomez-Sancha, T R W Herrmann, C Netsch, M Rieken, C M Scoffone, L Tunc and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05157529 (AQUABEAM® Robotic System and Ultrasound Accessories), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05157529 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

AQUABEAM® Robotic System and Ultrasound Accessories (AQUA Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsArmsAQUABEAM Robotic System, Apogee 2300 digital color doppler ultrasound imaging system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aquablation, a safe technique?Central European journal of urology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

T BachDepartment of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Harburg, Eissendorfer Pferdeweg 52, 22559, Hamburg, Germany. t.bach@asklepios.com.
I GiannakisDepartment of Urology, Kantonspital Frauenfeld, Kanton Thurgau, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-5001
A BachmannEuropean Association of Urology Section of Urotechnology (ESUT)-Lower Tract Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
C FioriEuropean Association of Urology Section of Urotechnology (ESUT)-Lower Tract Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Fernando Gomez-SanchaEuropean Association of Urology Section of Urotechnology (ESUT)-Lower Tract Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
T R W HerrmannEuropean Association of Urology Section of Urotechnology (ESUT)-Lower Tract Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
C NetschEuropean Association of Urology Section of Urotechnology (ESUT)-Lower Tract Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
M RiekenEuropean Association of Urology Section of Urotechnology (ESUT)-Lower Tract Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
C M ScoffoneEuropean Association of Urology Section of Urotechnology (ESUT)-Lower Tract Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
L TuncEuropean Association of Urology Section of Urotechnology (ESUT)-Lower Tract Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
J J RassweilerEuropean Association of Urology Section of Urotechnology (ESUT)-Lower Tract Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
E LiatsikosEuropean Association of Urology Section of Urotechnology (ESUT)-Lower Tract Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAquablation of the prostate using the AquaBeam™ system promises equivalent functional outcomes, reduced learning curve, and improved sexual function compared to transurethral prostate resection as shown in prospective randomized trials. This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate if published results can be transferred into the clinical routine in a non-selected patient collective.

methodsThis study includes all patients treated between September 2017 and June 2018 with Aquablation of the prostate. Patients have been evaluated prospectively for the perioperative course and early follow-up. Besides voiding parameter and symptom score, TRUS-volume change, ejaculatory function, and adverse events have been recorded.

results118 consecutive patients have been treated in the given time. Aquablation could be carried out successfully in all patients. IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and PVR improved significantly after the procedure and continued to improve during 3-month follow-up. Mean OR time was 20 min, TRUS volume decreased by 65%, and 73% of the patients retained antegrade ejaculation. Thirteen adverse events (> Clavien-Dindo I) occurred in 10 patients.

conclusionThe surgical ablation of the prostate using Aquablation achieved significant and immediate improvement of functional voiding parameters Qmax and PVR as well as symptomatic improvement of IPSS and QoL. Aquablation seems to be safe and effective with a low perioperative complication profile even in a non-selected group of patients.

Indexed as

WaterAblation TechniquesAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProstatic HyperplasiaSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalTransurethral Resection of ProstateTreatment OutcomeUrethral ObstructionWaterAquaBeamAquablationBPHBPOWaterjet

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.