Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288470›Full record

ReviewHepatology communications2018

Adherence to Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapies for Chronic Hepatitis B Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nathan Ford, Roz Scourse, Maud Lemoine, Yvan Hutin, Marc Bulterys, Zara Shubber, Dmytro Donchuk, Gilles Wandeler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatology communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [Interpretation of key updates of the 2026 version of the APASL clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic hepatitis B].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B infection: a 2026 update].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Chronic hepatitis B: from "treat only if" to "treat all"].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathan FordDepartment of HIV and Global Hepatitis Program World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland.
Roz ScourseMédecins Sans Frontières Access Campaign Geneva Switzerland.
Maud LemoineDepartment of Surgery and Cancer St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Yvan HutinDepartment of HIV and Global Hepatitis Program World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland.
Marc BulterysDepartment of HIV and Global Hepatitis Program World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland.
Zara ShubberDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Dmytro DonchukMédecins Sans Frontières Brussels Belgium.
Gilles WandelerDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine University of Berne Berne Switzerland.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R011117/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful treatment outcomes for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection requires high levels of adherence to treatment. We searched three databases and abstracts from two conferences up to January 2018 for studies reporting the proportion of patients who were adherent to HBV antiviral therapy and pooled data using random effects meta-analysis. We included 30 studies, providing data for 23,823 patients. Overall, adherence to treatment was 74.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67.1%-82.1%). Adherence was similar in high-income settings (75.1%; 95% CI, 65.4%-85.0%) and in low-income and middle-income settings (72.9%; 95% CI, 57.8%-88.0%). Reported barriers to adherence included forgetting, limited understanding of the importance of adherence, and change to routine.

Identifiers

PMID30288470
PMCPMC6167073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.