Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288463›Full record

ArticleACS omega2018

Approximating Isotope Distributions of Biomolecule Fragments.

Dennis Goldfarb, Michael J Lafferty, Laura E Herring, Wei Wang, Michael B Major

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dennis GoldfarbDepartment of Computer Science, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, UNC Michael Hooker Proteomics Core Facility, Department of Pharmacology, and Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.
Michael J LaffertyDepartment of Computer Science, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, UNC Michael Hooker Proteomics Core Facility, Department of Pharmacology, and Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.
Laura E HerringDepartment of Computer Science, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, UNC Michael Hooker Proteomics Core Facility, Department of Pharmacology, and Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.
Wei WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
Michael B MajorDepartment of Computer Science, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, UNC Michael Hooker Proteomics Core Facility, Department of Pharmacology, and Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.

Funding

TRAININGU54GM114833 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LINDSEY, MERRY L., PING, PEIPEI · 2014 to 2017
$13.8M
UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
Mining the Social Web to Monitor Public Health and HIV Risk BehaviorsU01HG008488 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CONDIE, TYSON, WANG, WEI · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
Fast and Robust Methods for Large Scale Genotype Phenotype Association StudyR01GM115833 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WANG, WEI · 2015 to 2017
$933k
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008488NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115833NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM114833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics, protein and peptide sequences are determined by the isolation and subsequent fragmentation of precursor ions. When an isolation window captures only part of a precursor's isotopic distribution, the isotope distributions of the fragments depend on the subset of isolated precursor isotopes. Approximation of the expected isotope distributions of these fragments prior to sequence determination enables MS2 deisotoping, monoisotopic mass calculation, charge assignment of fragment peaks, and deconvolution of chimeric spectra. However, currently such methods do not exist, and precursor isotope distributions are often used as a proxy. Here, we present methods that approximate the isotope distribution of a biomolecule's fragment given its monoisotopic mass, the monoisotopic mass of its precursor, the set of isolated precursor isotopes, and optionally sulfur atom content. Our methods use either the Averagine model or splines, the latter of which have similar accuracy to the Averagine approach, but are 20 times faster to compute. Theoretical and approximated isotope distributions are consistent for fragments of in silico digested peptides. Furthermore, mass spectrometry experiments with the angiotensin I peptide and HeLa cell lysate demonstrate that the fragment methods match isotope peaks in MS2 spectra more accurately than the precursor Averagine approach. The algorithms for the approximation of fragment isotope distributions have been added to the OpenMS software library. By providing the means for analyzing fragment isotopic distributions, these methods will improve MS2 spectra interpretation.

Identifiers

PMID30288463
PMCPMC6166224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.