ArticleACS omega2018
Approximating Isotope Distributions of Biomolecule Fragments.
Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromatography-Free Analysis of Mixtures Using a Two-Dimensional Mass Spectrometry (2DMS)-Enabled Quadrupole Time-of-Flight (QToF) Analyzer.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Conditional Fragment Ion Probabilities Improve Database Searching for Nonmonoisotopic Precursors.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- The isotope distribution: A rose with thorns.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
- Unraveling Posttranslational Modification Complexity: Advances in Quantitative Histone Proteoform Mass Spectrometry.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics, protein and peptide sequences are determined by the isolation and subsequent fragmentation of precursor ions. When an isolation window captures only part of a precursor's isotopic distribution, the isotope distributions of the fragments depend on the subset of isolated precursor isotopes. Approximation of the expected isotope distributions of these fragments prior to sequence determination enables MS2 deisotoping, monoisotopic mass calculation, charge assignment of fragment peaks, and deconvolution of chimeric spectra. However, currently such methods do not exist, and precursor isotope distributions are often used as a proxy. Here, we present methods that approximate the isotope distribution of a biomolecule's fragment given its monoisotopic mass, the monoisotopic mass of its precursor, the set of isolated precursor isotopes, and optionally sulfur atom content. Our methods use either the Averagine model or splines, the latter of which have similar accuracy to the Averagine approach, but are 20 times faster to compute. Theoretical and approximated isotope distributions are consistent for fragments of in silico digested peptides. Furthermore, mass spectrometry experiments with the angiotensin I peptide and HeLa cell lysate demonstrate that the fragment methods match isotope peaks in MS2 spectra more accurately than the precursor Averagine approach. The algorithms for the approximation of fragment isotope distributions have been added to the OpenMS software library. By providing the means for analyzing fragment isotopic distributions, these methods will improve MS2 spectra interpretation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.