Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288298›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2018

How to engage patients in research and quality improvement in community-based primary care settings: protocol for a participatory action research pilot study.

Julie Haesebaert, Isabelle Samson, Hélène Lee-Gosselin, Sabrina Guay-Bélanger, Jean-François Proteau, Guy Drouin, Chantal Guimont, Luc Vigneault, Annie Poirier, Priscille-Nice Sanon and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Julie Haesebaert1Centre de recherche sur les soins et services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, Quebec G1J 0A4 Canada.
Isabelle Samson3Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec Canada.
Hélène Lee-Gosselin4Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec Canada.
Sabrina Guay-Bélanger1Centre de recherche sur les soins et services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, Quebec G1J 0A4 Canada.
Jean-François ProteauQuebec City, Canada.
Guy DrouinQuebec City, Canada.
Chantal GuimontQuebec City, Canada.
Luc VigneaultQuebec City, Canada.
Annie PoirierQuebec City, Canada.
Priscille-Nice SanonQuebec City, Canada.
Geneviève Roch6Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, Quebec City, Quebec Canada.
Marie-Ève Poitras8Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Quebec Canada.
Annie LeBlanc1Centre de recherche sur les soins et services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, Quebec G1J 0A4 Canada.
France Légaré1Centre de recherche sur les soins et services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, Quebec G1J 0A4 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

plain english summaryMaking primary care clinics more patient-centered is key to improving patients' experience of care. If patients themselves were engaged in helping define priorities and suggesting quality improvements in the clinic, care would respond better to their needs. However, patient engagement is a new phenomenon, particularly in community based primary care clinics. How to engage patients in quality improvement in these clinics, or what effect this might have, is not well known. The involvement of patients needs to be adapted to the way these clinics function. The aim of this study is to create and evaluate a new model of patient engagement for quality improvement in community based primary care clinics. Patients, primary care professionals and researchers will create advisory councils in two primary care clinics in Quebec City (Canada). In each clinic, the advisory council will include 12 patients or caregivers registered at the clinic, a clinician and a clinic manager. The advisory council will meet every 6 weeks for a total of six meetings. Two patient-experts will facilitate meetings. During meetings, members of the council will list their needs in order of importance. Then they will suggest improvements in line with these needs. We will study if our advisory council model is well adapted to community based primary care settings and meets participants' expectations. At the end of the study we will be able to offer guidance about engaging patients with health professionals in quality improvement in primary care clinics. ABSTRACT:

Indexed as

Participatory action researchPatient advisory councilPatient-centerednessPatient involvementPrimary careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID30288298
PMCPMC6166288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.