Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288284›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2018

Features of incident colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome.

Tanja E Argillander, Jan J Koornstra, Mariette van Kouwen, Alexandra Mj Langers, Fokko M Nagengast, Juda Vecht, Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Evelien Dekker, Peter van Duijvendijk, Hans Fa Vasen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tanja E ArgillanderDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2410-6948
Jan J KoornstraDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mariette van KouwenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alexandra Mj LangersDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Fokko M NagengastDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Juda VechtDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen CappelDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Evelien DekkerDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter van DuijvendijkDepartment of Surgery, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
Hans Fa VasenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveDespite intensive colonoscopic surveillance, a substantial proportion of Lynch syndrome (LS) patients develop colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to characterize incident CRC in LS patients.

methodsAll patients diagnosed with incident CRC after start of colonoscopic surveillance were identified in the Dutch LS Registry of 905 patients. A retrospective analysis of patient records was carried out for patient characteristics, survival, CRC characteristics and findings of previous colonoscopy.

resultsSeventy-one patients (7.8%) were diagnosed with incident CRC. Median interval between incident CRC diagnosis and previous colonoscopy was 23.8 (range 6.7-45.6) months. Median tumor diameter was 2.5 cm, and 17% of the tumors were sessile or flat. Most patients (83%) had no lymph node metastases. There was no association between tumor size and colonoscopy interval or lymph node status. Most patients (65%) had no adenomas during previous colonoscopy. Two patients (2.8%) eventually died from metastatic CRC.

conclusionThe high frequency of incident CRC in LS likely results from several factors. Our findings lend support to the hypothesis of fast conversion of adenomas to CRC, as 65% of patients had no report of polyps during previous colonoscopy. High-quality colonoscopies are essential, especially as tumors and adenomas are difficult to detect because of their frequent non-polypoid appearance. Early detection due to surveillance as well as the indolent growth of CRC, as demonstrated by the lack of lymph node metastases, contributes to the excellent survival observed.

Indexed as

colonoscopic surveillancecolonoscopycolorectal cancerLynch syndrometumor morphology

Identifiers

PMID30288284
PMCPMC6169044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.