ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2018
Diabetes is an independent risk factor for delayed perforation after foreign bodies impacted in esophagus in adults.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Essential Hypertension as an Independent Risk Factor for Erosive Esophagitis: Insights From a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Perioperative management of Hem-o-lokArchives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes of sharp esophageal foreign bodies in elderly patients: a retrospective study from Wuhan, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Nomogram to predict gas-related complications during transoral endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: Clinical significance.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Nomogram to predict gas-related complications during transoral endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Esophageal Foreign Body Ingestion: Differences Among Weekday, Weekends, and Holidays.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerforation is the most serious complication of esophageal foreign bodies. Studies examining the association between diabetes and esophageal foreign body-induced perforation are largely non-existent.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for esophageal foreign body-induced perforation.
methodsA retrospective chart review of patients with esophageal foreign bodies between January 2012-January 2017 was performed at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: those complicated with perforation and those without perforation. Date on patient demographics, symptoms, foreign bodies, and diabetes were collected and analyzed. Study-specific odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models.
resultsOf 294 patients with esophageal foreign bodies (41.84% male, mean age, 56.73 years), 33 (11.22%) complicated by perforation. Diabetes (odds ratio = 6.00; 95% confidence interval = 1.72-20.23), duration (>24 h) of foreign bodies retention (odds ratio = 4.25; 95% confidence interval = 1.71-10.86), and preoperative fever (odds ratio = 8.19; 95% confidence interval = 3.17-21.74) were strongly associated with an increased risk of perforation, whereas the sensation of a foreign body (odds ratio = 0.32; 95% confidence interval = 0.09-0.92) was a protective factor of perforation. Glucose level was not observed to have an association among patients with or without perforation.
conclusionsDiabetes and duration of foreign body retention increase risk for esophageal foreign bodies complicated by perforation, and cases with elevated armpit temperature may represented a more likely perforation compared with those without fever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.