Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288275›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2018

Diabetes is an independent risk factor for delayed perforation after foreign bodies impacted in esophagus in adults.

Shaowei Zhang, Jiaxin Wen, Mingmei Du, Yunxi Liu, Lianbin Zhang, Xiangyang Chu, Zhiqiang Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Perioperative management of Hem-o-lokArchives of medical science : AMS · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shaowei ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-754X
Jiaxin WenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mingmei DuDepartment of Infection Management and Disease Control, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yunxi LiuDepartment of Infection Management and Disease Control, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lianbin ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiangyang ChuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhiqiang XueDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerforation is the most serious complication of esophageal foreign bodies. Studies examining the association between diabetes and esophageal foreign body-induced perforation are largely non-existent.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for esophageal foreign body-induced perforation.

methodsA retrospective chart review of patients with esophageal foreign bodies between January 2012-January 2017 was performed at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: those complicated with perforation and those without perforation. Date on patient demographics, symptoms, foreign bodies, and diabetes were collected and analyzed. Study-specific odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models.

resultsOf 294 patients with esophageal foreign bodies (41.84% male, mean age, 56.73 years), 33 (11.22%) complicated by perforation. Diabetes (odds ratio = 6.00; 95% confidence interval = 1.72-20.23), duration (>24 h) of foreign bodies retention (odds ratio = 4.25; 95% confidence interval = 1.71-10.86), and preoperative fever (odds ratio = 8.19; 95% confidence interval = 3.17-21.74) were strongly associated with an increased risk of perforation, whereas the sensation of a foreign body (odds ratio = 0.32; 95% confidence interval = 0.09-0.92) was a protective factor of perforation. Glucose level was not observed to have an association among patients with or without perforation.

conclusionsDiabetes and duration of foreign body retention increase risk for esophageal foreign bodies complicated by perforation, and cases with elevated armpit temperature may represented a more likely perforation compared with those without fever.

Indexed as

diabetes mellitusEsophageal perforationforeign bodies

Identifiers

PMID30288275
PMCPMC6169053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.