Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288270›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2018

Cost of hemodialysis in a public sector tertiary hospital of India.

Gunjeet Kaur, Shankar Prinja, Raja Ramachandran, Pankaj Malhotra, Krishan Lal Gupta, Vivekanand Jha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Out of Pocket Expenditure among Critical Care Insured Patients Admitted in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Coastal Karnataka, India: A Cross-Sectional Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Healthcare Cost of Cochlear Implantation in India.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gunjeet KaurSchool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Shankar PrinjaSchool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Raja RamachandranDepartment of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Pankaj MalhotraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Krishan Lal GuptaDepartment of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Vivekanand JhaDepartment of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNearly 220000 patients are diagnosed with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) every year, which calls for an additional demand of 34 million dialysis sessions in India. The government of India has announced a National Dialysis Programme to provide for free dialysis in public hospitals. In this article we estimate the overall cost of performing hemodialysis (HD) in a tertiary care hospital. Second, we assess the catastrophic impact of out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPEs) for HD on households and its determinants.

methodsThe economic health system cost of HD was estimated using bottom-up costing methods. All resources, capital and recurrent, utilized for service delivery from April 2015 to March 2016 were identified, measured and valued. Capital costs were annualized after accounting for their useful life and discounting at 3% for future years. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to determine the effect of variation in the input prices and other assumptions on the annual health system cost. OOPEs were assessed by interviewing 108 patients undergoing HD in the study hospital to account for costs from the patient's perspective. The prevalence of catastrophic health expenditures (CHEs) was computed per threshold of 40% of non-food expenditures.

resultsThe overall average cost incurred by the health system per HD session was INR 4148 (US$64). Adjusting for capacity utilization, the health system incurred INR 3025 (US$47) per HD at 100% bed occupancy. The mean OOPE per patient per session was INR 2838 (US$44; 95% confidence interval US$34-55). The major components of this OOPE were medicines and consumables (64.1%). The prevalence of a CHE per HD session was 11.1%.

conclusionOur study findings would be useful in the context of planning for dialysis services, setting provider payment rates for dialysis under various publicly sponsored health insurance schemes and undertaking future cost-effectiveness analysis to guide resource allocation decisions.

Indexed as

catastrophic expenditurecost analysisdialysiseconomic evaluationhemodialysisout-of-pocket expenditure

Identifiers

PMID30288270
PMCPMC6165756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.