Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288259›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2018

Haemodynamic or metabolic stimulation tests to reveal the renal functional response: requiem or revival?

Bart De Moor, Johan F Vanwalleghem, Quirine Swennen, Koen J Stas, Björn K I Meijers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Glomerular filtration rate reserve is reduced during mild passive heat stress in healthy young adults.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Glomerular hyperfiltration as a therapeutic target for CKD.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Acute kidney injury and aging.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A call to action to evaluate renal functional reserve in patients with COVID-19.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bart De MoorFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Johan F VanwalleghemDepartment of Nephrology, Jessa Hospital of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Quirine SwennenFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Koen J StasDepartment of Nephrology, Jessa Hospital of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Björn K I MeijersDepartment of Nephrology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jessa Hospital · BEHasselt University · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal stimulation tests document the dynamic response of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after a single or a combination of stimuli, such as an intravenous infusion of dopamine or amino acids or an oral protein meal. The increment of the GFR above the unstimulated state has formerly been called the renal functional reserve (RFR). Although the concept of a renal reserve capacity has not withstood scientific scrutiny, the literature documenting renal stimulation merits renewed interest. An absent or a blunted response of the GFR after a stimulus indicates lost or diseased nephrons. This information is valuable in preventing, diagnosing and prognosticating acute kidney injury and pregnancy-related renal events as well as chronic kidney disease. However, before renal function testing is universally practiced, some shortcomings must be addressed. First, a common nomenclature should be decided upon. The expression of RFR should be replaced by renal functional response. Second, a simple protocol must be developed and propagated. Third, we suggest designing prospective studies linking a defective stimulatory response to emergence of renal injury biomarkers, to histological or morphological renal abnormalities and to adverse renal outcomes in different renal syndromes.

Indexed as

protein stimulation testrenal functional reserverenal functional responserenal stimulation testrenal stress test

Identifiers

PMID30288259
PMCPMC6165749
OpenAlexW2797560060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.