ArticleMedChemComm2018
Lipophilicity prediction of peptides and peptide derivatives by consensus machine learning.
Article in MedChemComm, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peptide Property Prediction for Mass Spectrometry Using AI: An Introduction to State of the Art Models.Proteomics · 2025Review
- Predicting Distribution Coefficients (LogD) of Cyclic Peptides Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Anti-Cancer Peptides: Status and Future Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Machine Learning for Fast, Quantum Mechanics-Based Approximation of Drug Lipophilicity.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Revisiting the Use of Quantum Chemical Calculations in LogPMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development of Anticancer Peptides Using Artificial Intelligence and Combinational Therapy for Cancer Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Deep Learning for Deep Chemistry: Optimizing the Prediction of Chemical Patterns.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lipophilicity prediction is routinely applied to small molecules and presents a working alternative to experimental log
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.