Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288124›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2018

Use of bone-modifying agents among breast cancer patients with bone metastasis: evidence from oncology practices in the US.

Leah J McGrath, Robert A Overman, Diane Reams, Karynsa Cetin, Alexander Liede, Steven A Narod, M Alan Brookhart, Rohini K Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessment of Bone Health Awareness and Education in Breast Cancer Patients with Bone Metastasis in the USA.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Medication adherence with denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors treated in routine clinical settings: a retrospective study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leah J McGrathNoviSci, LLC, Durham, NC, USA, lmcgrath@novisci.com.
Robert A OvermanNoviSci, LLC, Durham, NC, USA, lmcgrath@novisci.com.
Diane ReamsNoviSci, LLC, Durham, NC, USA, lmcgrath@novisci.com.
Karynsa CetinAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Alexander LiedeAmgen Inc, South San Franscisco, CA, USA.
Steven A NarodDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
M Alan BrookhartNoviSci, LLC, Durham, NC, USA, lmcgrath@novisci.com.
Rohini K HernandezAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBone-modifying agents (BMAs) are recommended for women with bone metastasis from breast cancer to prevent skeletal-related events. We examined the usage patterns and identified the factors associated with the use of BMAs (denosumab and intravenous bisphosphonates) among women in the US. PATIENTS AND

methodsElectronic health records from oncology clinics were used to identify women diagnosed with bone metastasis from breast cancer between 2013 and 2014. Patients were excluded if they had recently used a BMA or had concurrent cancer at an additional primary site. The incidence of BMA initiation, interruption, and reinitiation were estimated using competing risk regression models. A generalized linear model was used to estimate risk factors for treatment initiation and interruption.

resultsThere were 589 women diagnosed with bone metastasis from breast cancer. By 1 year, 68% of these patients (95% CI: 64%, 71%) had initiated treatment with a BMA. Denosumab and zoledronic acid were the most commonly used agents, whereas pamidronate was used infrequently. Young women were more likely to initiate a BMA than older women (adjusted risk difference: 6.4 [95% CI: 1.5, 10.9]). Of the 412 patients who initiated a BMA, 46% (95% CI: 41%, 51%) experienced an interruption within 1 year. Seventy-four percent (95% CI: 68%, 79%) of patients who interrupted their treatment had reinitiated therapy within 1 year of interruption.

conclusionThe majority of women diagnosed with bone metastasis from breast cancer initiate a BMA within 1 year of diagnosis, but a large proportion, particularly among the elderly, do not use these therapies.

Indexed as

bone metastasisbone-modifying agentsbreast cancerdenosumabelectronic health recordspamidronatetreatment patternszoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID30288124
PMCPMC6162990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.