Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30288088›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2018

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic pain: implications of new data for clinical practice.

Kok Yuen Ho, Kok Ann Gwee, Yew Kuang Cheng, Kam Hon Yoon, Hwan Tak Hee, Abdul Razakjr Omar

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06453291 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Approaches in Managing Chronic Low Back Pain: A Comparative Assessment of Clinical Techniques

TypeinterventionalSponsorIffat Anwar Medical ComplexRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsChronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)ArmsNSAIDs (Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs):, Standard Physical Therapy, Neuromodulation via Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG):, Platelet-Rich-Plasma Therapy
NCT06516094 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety Study of Celecoxib / Pregabalin / Vitamin B Fixed Dose Combination Versus Celecoxib + Vitamin B Versus Pregabalin + Vitamin B in the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain Mixed Component

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.Ran2024 to 2025Enrolled192ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsCelecoxib+Pregabalin+Vitamin B fixed dose, Celecoxib + Vitamin B fixed dose, Pregabalin + Vitamin B fixed dose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Construction of a predictive model for postoperative pain relief after microscopic spermatic cord surgery for spermatic cord pain].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Kok Yuen HoThe Pain Clinic, Mt Alvernia Hospital, drho@thepainclinic.com.sg.
Kok Ann GweeStomach, Liver, and Bowel Centre, Gleneagles Hospital.
Yew Kuang ChengFarrer Park Hospital.
Kam Hon YoonEl Shaddai Arthritis and Rheumatism Specialist Medical Centre.
Hwan Tak HeePinnacle Spine and Scoliosis Centre, Mt Elizabeth Medical Centre.
Abdul Razakjr OmarLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Arthritis and Rheumatism Associates · USGleneagles Hospital · SGMount Alvernia Hospital · GBMount Elizabeth Hospital · SGNanyang Technological University · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COX2-selective and nonselective (ns) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for chronic pain management. There are marked differences in the risk of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) events among different NSAIDs. In 2017, publication of two randomized controlled trials and an individual patient-data meta-analysis provided robust data on the relative GI and CV tolerability profiles of currently available NSAIDs. The PRECISION study showed similar CV-event rates with celecoxib vs naproxen and ibuprofen, but GI tolerability was better for celecoxib. In the CONCERN study of high-GI-risk patients, celecoxib was associated with fewer adverse GI-tract events than naproxen. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between celecoxib and ns-NSAIDs in the rate of acute myocardial infarction, and celecoxib was the only COX2-selective NSAID with a lower risk of adverse CV and GI events vs ns-NSAIDs. These data add to the body of knowledge about the relative tolerability of different NSAIDs and were used to propose an updated treatment algorithm. The decision about whether to use an NSAID and which one should be based on a patient's risk of developing adverse GI and CV events. Lower- and upper-GI-tract events need to be considered. Celecoxib has a better lower-GI-tract tolerability profile than ns-NSAIDs plus a proton-pump inhibitor. In addition, the latest data suggest that long-term use of celecoxib 200 mg/day may be appropriate for patients at increased CV risk.

Indexed as

cardiovascular riskchronic painCOX2 inhibitorsgastrointestinal risknonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Identifiers

PMID30288088
PMCPMC6160277
OpenAlexW2890017731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.